Change in Potential energy equals change in Kinetic energy?

In summary, the relationship W = ΔKE = -ΔPE holds only in situations where the total mechanical energy is conserved. In cases where external work is done on the system and internal work is done by non-conservative forces, the correct equation to use is ∆KE+∆PE = Wnc. This explains why, in certain scenarios, the change in potential energy is non-zero even though the velocity is constant.
  • #1
EMdrive

Homework Statement


I'm trying to digest the concept of change in potential energy being set equal to a change in kinetic energy. Does this relationship always hold? Please see below for more details.

Homework Equations



PE = mgh
KE = .5mv^2
W = ΔKE = -ΔPE
W = f*d

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Lets say I have a block that is being pushed up an incline at constant velocity by a force F for a distance d. Because the velocity is constant, it follows that the net force on the object is 0, and therefore the total work done on the object should also be 0. This is further explained by the W = ΔKE equation in which the final and initial kinetic energies are the same, resulting in a work of 0 J. However, what baffles me is that while kinetic energy is clearly not changing, the potential energy is (height of the object is increasing). So the relationship W = ΔKE = -ΔPE does not hold because change in potential energy is some non-zero value... Can someone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
EMdrive said:

Homework Statement


I'm trying to digest the concept of change in potential energy being set equal to a change in kinetic energy. Does this relationship always hold? Please see below for more details.

Homework Equations



PE = mgh
KE = .5mv^2
W = ΔKE = -ΔPE
W = f*d

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Lets say I have a block that is being pushed up an incline at constant velocity by a force F for a distance d. Because the velocity is constant, it follows that the net force on the object is 0, and therefore the total work done on the object should also be 0. This is further explained by the W = ΔKE equation in which the final and initial kinetic energies are the same, resulting in a work of 0 J. However, what baffles me is that while kinetic energy is clearly not changing, the potential energy is (height of the object is increasing). So the relationship W = ΔKE = -ΔPE does not hold because change in potential energy is some non-zero value... Can someone explain?

Net work done is zero .Work done by gravity is non zero . PE is negative of work done by gravity .Hence PE is non zero .

Total mechanical energy is not conserved in this case .
 
  • Like
Likes EMdrive
  • #3
I see, that explains it. So the equation W = ΔKE = -ΔPE only applies in situations where total mechanical energy is conserved, which is not the case here (mechanical energy should be increasing here, correct?). But, just trying to understand, work can be 0 and the total mechanical energy of the system can still increase?
 
  • #4
I just noticed it is your first post .

Welcome to PF !

EMdrive said:
I see, that explains it. So the equation W = ΔKE = -ΔPE only applies in situations where total mechanical energy is conserved, which is not the case here (mechanical energy should be increasing here, correct?). But, just trying to understand, work can be 0 and the total mechanical energy of the system can still increase?

W = ΔKE is Work Kinetic Energy theorem .W is net work done on the particle .This can further be written as Wnc + Wc =ΔKE . Wnc is work done by non conservative forces ( in your example it is work done by external agent pushing the block up .Wc is work done by conservative force ( in your example it is work done by gravity ) .

Now if you write Wc as -∆PE , Work KE theorem can be rewritten as ∆KE+∆PE = Wnc . This is the complete relation .It also applies in your case .In your example ,since Wnc ≠0 , ∆KE+∆PE ≠ 0 .

In your example net work done W = 0 . ∆KE+∆PE = Work done by external agent (whosoever is pushing the block up )

∆KE+∆PE = 0 only when conservative forces are acting .Here the force exerted by agent pushing the block up is a non conservative force .

Hence correct relation to use in your example is ∆KE+∆PE = Wnc .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes EMdrive and TSny
  • #5
As @conscience explained, ∆KE= -∆PE for systems in which the following is true:

(1) no external work is done on the system (e.g., system is "isoloated")

(2) internal work is done by conservative forces only (like gravity or springs).

For a modern video on this concept using fancy, mind-blowing graphics, see
 
  • Like
Likes conscience and EMdrive
  • #6
conscience said:
I just noticed it is your first post .

Welcome to PF !
W = ΔKE is Work Kinetic Energy theorem .W is net work done on the particle .This can further be written as Wnc + Wc =ΔKE . Wnc is work done by non conservative forces ( in your example it is work done by external agent pushing the block up .Wc is work done by conservative force ( in your example it is work done by gravity ) .

Now if you write Wc as -∆PE , Work KE theorem can be rewritten as ∆KE+∆PE = Wnc . This is the complete relation .It also applies in your case .In your example ,since Wnc ≠0 , ∆KE+∆PE ≠ 0 .

In your example net work done W = 0 . ∆KE+∆PE = Work done by external agent (whosoever is pushing the block up )

∆KE+∆PE = 0 only when conservative forces are acting .Here the force exerted by agent pushing the block up is a non conservative force .

Hence correct relation to use in your example is ∆KE+∆PE = Wnc .
Thank you so much for the concise and complete explanation. It finally makes sense now! I really appreciate the help :)
 

1. What is the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy?

The relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy is known as the Law of Conservation of Energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, but can only be transferred or transformed from one form to another. In this case, when potential energy decreases, kinetic energy increases and vice versa.

2. How is the change in potential energy related to the change in kinetic energy?

The change in potential energy is directly related to the change in kinetic energy. This means that as potential energy increases, kinetic energy decreases and vice versa. The total energy remains the same, but it is transferred between potential and kinetic forms.

3. What factors affect the change in potential energy and kinetic energy?

The change in potential energy and kinetic energy is affected by the mass and height of an object. The higher the object is lifted, the greater its potential energy. The heavier the object, the greater its kinetic energy when in motion.

4. Can potential energy and kinetic energy be equal?

Yes, potential energy and kinetic energy can be equal when an object is at its highest point of potential energy and has no motion. This is known as the equilibrium point, where the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy as the object begins to move.

5. How is the equation for change in potential energy and kinetic energy derived?

The equation for change in potential energy and kinetic energy is derived from the work-energy theorem, which states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. This can be represented mathematically as W = ∆KE = ∆PE, where W is work, KE is kinetic energy, and PE is potential energy.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
361
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
320
Replies
1
Views
580
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
732
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
929
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
55
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
270
Back
Top