Can you tell me what I must read based on this description?

  • Thread starter babaliaris
  • Start date
In summary, you must read the content based on the provided description. As an expert summarizer, I do not provide responses or replies to questions, but rather a condensed summary of the information. It is important to read the content thoroughly to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
  • #1
babaliaris
116
15
Summary: I have a desctiption of the physics class and the topics of a book but I don't know how to connect them and know what to read from the book.

This is the description of the topics for the physics class which I'm attempting:

General curvilinear motion of point material. Reference systems and related movement. Point material dynamics. Central forces and dynamic energy. Pursuing momentum, momentum, and energy. Dynamic solid body. Gravity field. The special theory of relativity. Relativistic dynamics

These are the topics of the book which I own :
http://www.primeuniversity.edu.bd/160517/vc/eBook/download/fundamentals-of-physics-textbook.pdf
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Sounds like the description of an entire physics curriculum. I'd think you should look at a general textbook like Halliday, Resnick, Walker or Tipler, but you should know at which level the physics class will be.
 
  • #3
I have the book of Halliday & Resnick http://www.primeuniversity.edu.bd/160517/vc/eBook/download/fundamentals-of-physics-textbook.pdf which covers everything! But I don't have the time to read it all in one semester, I must focus on succeeding in this course.

From the desription do you think I need to read circuits, magnetic fields, and coulombs law? I believe this is out of the scope of this class, since I'm an electrical and computer engineer and will learn that in a class called Electromagnetism Physics.
 
  • #4
babaliaris said:
I have the book of Halliday & Resnick http://www.primeuniversity.edu.bd/160517/vc/eBook/download/fundamentals-of-physics-textbook.pdf which covers everything! But I don't have the time to read it all in one semester, I must focus on succeeding in this course.

From the desription do you think I need to read circuits, magnetic fields, and coulombs law? I believe this is out of the scope of this class, since I'm an electrical and computer engineer and will learn that in a class called Electromagnetism Physics.

Yes, the course you describe doesn't include EM. Looking at the book contents, I would say the following chapters are relevant for the course you describe:

1-9
10-11 (Probably)
13
15
16 (Possibly)
37 (*)

(*) I suspect you might be better with a separate textbook dedicated to SR.
 
  • #5
The only question is, how to motivate and understand SR without electromagnetism?
 
  • #6
vanhees71 said:
The only question is, how to motivate and understand SR without electromagnetism?

I didn't have any problems. It was learning SR (six years ago) that turned me on to studying physics. I think it stands as a theory of spacetime, that is beautiful and satisfying in its own right.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
  • #7
From the course description i would guess it would be some type of classical mechanics / analytical mechanics course with some introduction to relativity at advanced undergraduate/ graduate level. On the other hand i don't believe many books outside of "Feynman's lectures" can cover so much material and still be usefull beyond freshman level. "Point material" suggests there will be no internal interaction and resulting mechanics will be deterministic (Newtonian). Pretty much all reference system and field related statements suggest course will be heavy on mathematics (on fields may or may not be limited to vector fields). Dynamic solid body most probably means rotation of rigid bodies, i would assume special relativity will be on super-introductory level for this course probably brief mention on Michelson-Morley experiment and including some Lorentz transformation without introducing any operators or tensors for that.
Focus on getting a feel for fields and learn basic of vector algeabra well (vector and scalar products etc) you will do just fine.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
  • #8
Thank you! You totally eased my frustration.

It makes sense to be a complete course on Newtonian physics and only an introduction to SR. When it comes to algebra, linear algebra - vectors, calculus, and diff equations I don't really have any problems. The only problems might be that I'm not that experienced on solving complicated integrals plus I don't know calculus 2 (Multiple integrations-double-triple integrals, closed path integration, that upside down delta :-p)

Well, I'll just start reading. Also prepare yourselves cause probably I'm going to do a lot of posts in the homework help section :-p
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeroK
  • #9
babaliaris said:
Summary: I have a desctiption of the physics class and the topics of a book but I don't know how to connect them and know what to read from the book.

This is the description of the topics for the physics class which I'm attempting:
What's the title of the course? What are the prerequisites? Can you get the textbook and syllabus for the course? Have you asked the professor who teaches the course?
 
  • #10
The course is called just Physics (We have another one called Electromagnetic Field 1 in the next semester and another one after that (next year) which is called Electromagnetic Field 2).

For prerequisites says only this, nothing else:
For the mathematical description, we will use vectors in 3D space, derivatives, integrals and some simple differential equations.

I haven't asked the professor since I'm a distant student. I would send him an email but since he didn't even bother to upload the curriculum why will he answer me back? Here in Greece, most professors don't answer back on emails...

There is a course textbook, but I didn't purchase it since usually Greek textbooks aren't really good and I already have one of the best books for physics. Also sometimes the books they give us do not even cover the entire curriculum (I know this sounds weird but its true).
 
  • #11
The description for the physics course you supplied, … general curvilinear coordinates, reference frames etc, indicates this course is at the level of junior/senior physics or possibly engineering mechanics. The description of the book you have is freshman/sophomore level physics. You can expect the upcoming course to be in greater depth (and mathematical demand) on a limited number of topics rather than the more general treatment that you have with your current textbook.
 
  • #12
mpresic3 said:
The description for the physics course you supplied, … general curvilinear coordinates, reference frames etc, indicates this course is at the level of junior/senior physics or possibly engineering mechanics. The description of the book you have is freshman/sophomore level physics. You can expect the upcoming course to be in greater depth (and mathematical demand) on a limited number of topics rather than the more general treatment that you have with your current textbook.

Yes, I'm an Electrical And Computer Engineer undergraduate student. This is the only physics course about mechanical physics. After that, we have two more physics courses called "Electromagnetic field 1 and Electromagnetic field 2" (maxwells equations, coulombs law, gauss law etc).
 

Related to Can you tell me what I must read based on this description?

1. What is the purpose of asking for recommended reading based on a description?

The purpose of asking for recommended reading based on a description is to receive suggestions for books or articles that may provide further insight or information on a specific topic or subject.

2. How do you determine what someone should read based on a description?

To determine what someone should read based on a description, a scientist may consider the specific keywords or concepts mentioned in the description and search for relevant literature or research on those topics.

3. Can you recommend any specific sources or authors based on a description?

Yes, as a scientist, I can recommend specific sources or authors that may be relevant to the description provided. However, it is important to note that recommendations may vary depending on the individual's specific interests and needs.

4. How do you ensure that the recommended reading is reliable and accurate?

To ensure that the recommended reading is reliable and accurate, a scientist may consider the credibility of the source and the quality of the research or information presented. It is also important to cross-reference information from multiple sources.

5. Is it necessary to read all of the recommended material?

No, it is not necessary to read all of the recommended material. The purpose of recommended reading is to provide additional resources for further learning and understanding. It is up to the individual to determine which sources are most relevant and beneficial for their specific needs.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
46
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
0
Views
726
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
4
Views
955
  • Science and Math Textbooks
2
Replies
62
Views
53K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
709
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
Back
Top