Can We Really Travel Back to Our Own Past?

  • Thread starter aaryan0077
  • Start date
In summary, the concept of travelling faster than the speed of light and going into the past is not supported by the time-dilation formula. Instead, for speeds greater than c, the formula becomes imaginary, suggesting a traveller would enter into imaginary time. Therefore, our own past may not be our own as we perceive it.
  • #1
aaryan0077
69
0
Our past is not our past? Or Does past changes when we travel fast enogh?

We have a light cone
http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/6463/lightcone3.jpg
Vertical and horizontal axis representing time and space respectively.
Here L1, L2 & L3 represent path allowed for massive bodies, light and path not allowed respectively.
I know we can't get to speed of light or more ( atleast for now, unless we don't have any sort of startrek or skynet technology :-p ) but we know that when we get closer and closer to c, time starts to dilates (& I know there are many threads on time dilation here, but my question is different) and we are "said to" (whatever this means) travel into future (remember twin paradox) and if (by any means) we cross the speed limit of c we'll travel back into the past, atleast that is what is supposed to happen.
But any object (here WE) faster than light will follow L3 (or any path between L2 and horizontal axis) and so we'll get to else where region and not our past, contrary to what is supposed that we'll travel to past.
So will that elsewhere be our past if we traveled like this?
Or is our own past not our "own" as we accept it to be?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi aaryan0077! :smile:
aaryan0077 said:
… and if (by any means) we cross the speed limit of c we'll travel back into the past, atleast that is what is supposed to happen.

No, that's mathematical rubbish.

The time-dilation formula is √(1 - v2/c2) …

if the formula was (1 - v2/c2),

then you'd be right … for v > c, time dilation would be negative, and a traveller would go back into the past

but it isn't, and for v > c, the correct time-dilation formula becomes imaginary, not negative …

I suppose you could say that means that a traveller goes into imaginary time! :wink:
 
  • #3


The concept of time travel and its implications on the past is a fascinating topic to explore. While it is true that as we approach the speed of light, time dilation occurs and we can theoretically travel into the future, it is important to note that this does not necessarily mean we can travel into our own past.

Firstly, the concept of time itself is a human construct and is relative to the observer. This means that what is considered the past for one person may not be the same for another person. Our perception of the past is also influenced by our memories and experiences, which are constantly changing and evolving.

Secondly, the light cone diagram provided in the content shows that there are certain paths that are not allowed for massive objects, known as L3. This means that even if we were to travel faster than the speed of light, we would not be able to follow a path that leads back to our own past. We would simply end up in a different region of space and time.

Furthermore, the concept of causality also plays a role in this discussion. The idea that an effect cannot occur before its cause is a fundamental principle in physics. If we were able to travel back in time, we would be able to change events that have already happened, creating paradoxes and disrupting the natural order of cause and effect.

In conclusion, while it is possible for time dilation to occur and for us to theoretically travel into the future, it is unlikely that we can travel into our own past. Our past is constantly changing and evolving, and the laws of physics prevent us from traveling back in time. Our past is our own, but our perception of it may be influenced by our experiences and memories.
 

Related to Can We Really Travel Back to Our Own Past?

What does it mean when people say "Our past is not our past"?

When people say "Our past is not our past," they are referring to the idea that our past experiences and actions continue to impact and shape our present and future. It suggests that we cannot escape the consequences of our past choices and behaviors, and that our past is an ongoing part of who we are.

Why is it important to acknowledge that our past is not our past?

Acknowledging that our past is not our past allows us to take responsibility for our actions and learn from our mistakes. It also helps us understand that our past experiences, both positive and negative, have shaped us into who we are today and can provide valuable insights for our future growth.

Can we change our past?

No, we cannot change what has already happened in the past. However, we can change how we perceive and respond to our past experiences. By reflecting on our past and learning from it, we can make positive changes in our present and future.

How can understanding that our past is not our past benefit us?

Understanding that our past is not our past can benefit us in several ways. It can help us develop a deeper understanding of ourselves and others, improve our decision-making, and promote personal growth and resilience. It can also help us break free from negative patterns and behaviors that may be holding us back.

Is it possible to let go of our past?

While we cannot erase our past, it is possible to let go of any negative emotions or attachments associated with it. This process may involve forgiveness, acceptance, and self-reflection. By letting go of our past, we can move forward with a clearer and more positive mindset.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
669
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
847
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
4K
Replies
90
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
307
Back
Top