Can the Planck Function Determine Single Photon Emitted Flux?

In summary, The Planck Function, when integrated over all wavelengths, provides the radiated power per unit area for a black body. By using the unintegrated function, a single photon energy emitted by the source can be found, rather than a range. However, the formulae for spectral energy density and spectral emissive power approximate the quantised distributions to smooth distributions, making the energy density and emitted energy per unit area zero at any specific wavelength or frequency. These formulae are often written with d\lambda on each side, and can also be defined in terms of frequency, but with different formulae that can be prone to errors.
  • #1
Rod Brown
1
0
For my own edification.

The Planck Function when integrated over all wavelengths will give the radiated power per unit area for a black body. Would I be right in thinking, that if I had a known temperature for the black body source or indeed a kT value for that source that by using the function unintegrated, an emitted flux can be found for a single photon energy (frequency) being emitted by that source rather than a range? does Bv = emitted flux in the usual sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
No. The formulae for spectral energy density and spectral emissive power (per unit area) 'approximate' the quantised distributions to smooth distributions. I've put 'approximate' in quotes, because the approximation is, to all intents and purposes, undetectable.

So when you use these distributions, the energy density or emitted energy per unit area is zero at any particular wavelength (or frequency), just in the same way as the probability of finding on a beach a pebble of mass 1.0000000000000000000000000000... gram (or 1.08172305825769346720638560... gram) is zero.

That's why the formulae are often written as u[itex]\lambda[/itex] d[itex]\lambda[/itex] = [stuff]d[itex]\lambda[/itex] and E[itex]\lambda[/itex] d[itex]\lambda[/itex] = [similar stuff]d[itex]\lambda[/itex], including d[itex]\lambda[/itex] on each side.

Note that you can also define spectral energy density and spectral emissive power as distributions in terms of frequency. The formulae are somewhat different, and it is easy to make mistakes.
 
Last edited:

Related to Can the Planck Function Determine Single Photon Emitted Flux?

1. What is the Planck function and flux?

The Planck function and flux are mathematical equations that describe the amount of radiation emitted by a blackbody at a given temperature. They are named after German physicist Max Planck, who first derived these equations in 1900.

2. How is the Planck function and flux used in science?

The Planck function and flux are used in various fields of science, including astrophysics, atmospheric science, and remote sensing. They are commonly used to calculate the amount of radiation emitted by different objects, such as stars, planets, and gases, and to understand their thermal properties.

3. What factors affect the values of the Planck function and flux?

The values of the Planck function and flux are affected by several factors, including the temperature of the object, the wavelength of the radiation, and the material properties of the object. Additionally, the Planck function and flux are also affected by the units and scales used to measure them.

4. Can the Planck function and flux be applied to non-blackbody objects?

While the Planck function and flux were originally derived for blackbody objects, they can also be applied to non-blackbody objects by using certain modifications and assumptions. For example, the emissivity of the object can be used to account for the material properties, and the concept of effective temperature can be used to estimate the temperature of non-blackbody objects.

5. Are there any limitations to the use of the Planck function and flux?

Yes, there are some limitations to the use of the Planck function and flux. These equations assume that the object is in thermal equilibrium and that all energy is being radiated as electromagnetic radiation. This may not be true for all objects, and therefore, the values calculated using the Planck function and flux may not be entirely accurate. Additionally, these equations do not take into account factors such as scattering and absorption of radiation, which can also affect the observed flux.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top