Callan-Symanzik equation for Effective Potential

In summary, the conversation discusses equations (13.24) and (13.25) in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT book, specifically the change from the Callan-Symanzik equation for the Effective Action to the Effective Potential. The relation for constant ##\phi_{cl}## is mentioned as ##\Gamma[\phi_{cl}] = -(VT)\cdot V_{eff}(\phi_{cl})##, equation (11.50) in the book. The conversation then goes on to discuss how to get from (13.24) to (13.25) using a discretized space and defining the quantity V(φ). It is mentioned that getting (13.25) should be obvious after going back
  • #1
thatboi
121
18
Hey all,
I am looking equations (13.24),(13.25) in Peskin & Schroeder's QFT book and I am confused about how they change from the Callan-Symanzik equation for the Effective Action to the Effective Potential. I thought the relation for constant ##\phi_{cl}## was ##\Gamma[\phi_{cl}] = -(VT)\cdot V_{eff}(\phi_{cl})##, equation (11.50) in the book. But making such a substitution into (13.24), I do not understand how to get to (13.25).
Any advice would be appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
First imagine that the space is discretized, so that you can write
$$\int dx\, \phi(x)\frac{\delta}{\delta\phi(x)}\Gamma[\phi]=
\sum_{x=1,2,\cdots} \phi_x \frac{\partial}{\partial\phi_x} \Gamma(\phi_1,\phi_2,\ldots)$$
Then define the quantity
$$V(\phi)=\Gamma(\phi,\phi,\ldots)$$
Clearly
$$\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}=\sum_{x}\left(\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi}$$
so
$$\phi\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}=
\sum_{x}\phi\left(\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi} =
\left( \sum_{x} \phi_x\frac{\partial \Gamma}{\partial\phi_x} \right)_{\phi_1=\phi_2=\cdots=\phi}$$
Finally turn back to the continuous ##x##, so that the last formula can be written as
$$\left( \int dx\, \phi(x)\frac{\delta}{\delta\phi(x)}\Gamma[\phi]\right)_{\phi(x) =\phi, \; \forall x}
=\phi\frac{\partial V}{\partial\phi}$$
Now getting (13.25) should be obvious.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and malawi_glenn

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
890
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
924
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
898
Replies
1
Views
661
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
921
Replies
0
Views
727
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top