Exploring Physics without a Course: Questions & Ideas

In summary, the author thinks that if radioactive materials are placed next to each other an E-field will be created that can be used to generate electricity. He thinks that this could be done at a small scale using an array of devices.
  • #1
Carbonator
2
0
Ok, I am not in any physics courses, programs, associations, nothing.
I have never taken a physics course
But I was just wondering a few things.

1) If you take two pieces of radioactive material, one of which is more radioactive than the other and put them beside each other, would anything happen. Specifically, would particles from one move towards the other?

2) An electromagnetic field. How would it interact in the presence of radioactive particles. IE, would it move, shift, or become altered in any way. And could you measure how much it moved?

3)When a magnet moves about a coil of wire, electricity is generated down the wire, yes? And the effect is produced by the electromagnetic fields affecting the electrons in the wire, or in the field itself?

OK, so if by moving an E-Field around wires, you make electricity, and If(IF!) radiation could move an E-Field enough, could you not place radioactive materials between an E-Field, causing it to move, and making Electricity? And if one were to say that on a large scale this would be too inefficient, could it be done at a smaller scale, with arrays of these devices working together (lets forget timing for now.)


If anyone would like to comment, please do. BTW, I am the poster child for laymen-ness in the world of physics. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Generally speaking, radioactivity is a process of nuclear decay. That is, the nucleus of the atoms are unstable and seek a more stable arangement of the nucleus. To do this, a radioactive atom emits particles and photons of energy from the nucleus until it becomes "stable"
The type of particles and photons emitted, their energy, the rate of emission and the length of time needed for "stability" varies from one type of radioactive atom to another, but is well established.
Radioactivity is a TRUE energy source, as the material literally emitts energy and mass which can be convertefd to useful work, and the material during this process undergoes changes that eventually stops the process; meaning that physics laws are not violated and a perpetual motion machine is impossible.
A magnetic material is not "emmisive" in the sense of particles or photonic energy, and does not "decay" on a nuclear level. Because of this, a magnetic material can never be considered an energy source in itself, but must be manipulated(requiring energy) to produce energy(always LESS is produced than required for manipulation, resulting in loss)
Can radiation move an E-field? Yes, but more correctly, it reacts with it. What I mean is that, generally, an E-field moves(or deflects) a charged particle much more so than a charged particle moves an E-field because an E-field is generally much stronger(even in a magnet) than a single or series of charged particles coming from a radioactive source.
Could a specific arangement of a device based on your theory work? Probably so. However, the useful output would be extremely small compared with conventional methods to extract work from radioactive decay.
Keep thinking, though; the only bad idea is no idea, and who knows what could be "tweaked" with yor theory.
 
  • #3
Cool. So radiation can affect an E-Field

I was thinking that two pieces(?) of radiotctive material could be placed side by side. Then you run an e-field between the two pieces.

like this
e
{r}e{r}
{r}e{r}
{r}e{r}
e

(e's should be in the middle. Dang text formatting...)

the e-field extends beyond the r-material. As the field fluxes left and right(relative to where you want to look) it would come near a wire, or wires, or coil of wires. Anyhoo, The e-field goes Left, makes a +ive charge, Right, a -ive charge. And so on.

And yes, I did think that the total output would be minimal. But(!) if you were to have an array, maybe even at a very small scale, the T-Out would be the sum of all the parts(cliche? perhaps.) Even if this couldn't be used to power a car or a Rockem-Sockem Robot, it could apply to aux. power sources for satellites. Hey! I was thinking that some sort of catalyst could be used that is not inherently radioactive, but could be given its reaction to another material. Hmmmmm...Tangent!
 
  • #4
radioisotope thermoelectric generators

Radioactive materials are already being used to power spacecraft , especially far from the Sun where solar power becomes increasingly inefficient. Probes such as Galileo, Pioneer 10, and Voyager 2 drew most of their power from radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTGs).

The radioactive materials generate heat, which is used to produce electricity via thermocouples.

Quite a lot of research was done before RTGs were designed and chosen for space probes; IIRC, ideas similar to the one you posted were looked at, but there seemed to be no way to make such a generator that could make electricity more efficiently than an RTG ('efficiently' here means electrical power per kilogram of generator; weight (actually mass) is the most precious commodity for a spacecraft ).

Here's a link which explains RTGs in more detail:
http://en2.wikipedia.org/wiki/RITEG-beacon [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

1. What is "Exploring Physics without a Course"?

"Exploring Physics without a Course" is a concept that encourages individuals to learn and understand the principles of physics through self-directed exploration and experimentation, rather than following a traditional course curriculum.

2. How is this approach different from a traditional physics course?

This approach allows for more flexibility and creativity in the learning process. Rather than being limited to a pre-determined set of topics and experiments, individuals can choose to focus on areas of physics that interest them and conduct experiments that they design themselves.

3. Do I need a background in physics to explore without a course?

No, this approach is open to anyone regardless of their background in physics. It is designed to be accessible and engaging for individuals at all levels of knowledge and experience in the subject.

4. Can I still gain a thorough understanding of physics without following a traditional course?

Absolutely. In fact, many experts believe that self-directed learning can lead to a deeper understanding of a subject, as individuals are more engaged and motivated to learn when they have control over their own learning process.

5. How can I get started with exploring physics without a course?

There are many resources available online, such as books, videos, and interactive simulations, that can provide a starting point for self-directed learning. Additionally, joining a local physics club or seeking out a mentor in the field can also be helpful in guiding your exploration and providing support along the way.

Similar threads

  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
2
Views
571
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
827
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
849
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
2
Views
808
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top