Best dimensions for maximum surface area

In summary, the conversation discusses the possibility of finding the best dimensions for a rectangular box with a given surface area to maximize its volume. Two methods are suggested: reducing the number of variables using a constraint, or using the Lagrange Multiplier method. Both methods lead to the conclusion that a cube will maximize volume for a given surface area."
  • #1
bjgawp
84
0
I was doing some math problems involving surface area and maximum dimensions and then I wondered:
Suppose you are given the surface area of a rectangular box but none of its dimensions. Is it possible to find the best dimensions (x,y,z) that would give the maximum volume of the box? I was thinking of something along the lines of making a graph and finding its maximum value ... Ex. 400cm² = 2xy + 2xz + 2yz. Possible? Unless there are other ways of doing it...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Make a graph of what? Not the surface area function that you give: you want to maximize the volume: V= xyz.

The standard way of "maximizing" (or "minimizing") a function is to find its derivative and set that equal to 0. Since here you have a function of three variables (x,y,z) and an additional constraint, there are two ways to do it.

1) Use the constraint to reduce the number of variables: 2xy+ 2xz+ 2yz= 400 so 2(x+y)z= 400- 2xy so z= (200-xy)/(x+y) and then V= xy(200-xy)/(x+y). Differentiate that with respect to x and y (partial derivatives) and set them equal to 0. You can probably see those are going to be messy derivatives!

2) The Lagrange Multiplier method: At a maximum (or minimum) value, the gradient of the function must be a multiple of the gradient of the constraint. Here the function to be maximized is V= xyz. grad V= yzi+ xzj+ xyk. The constraint function is U= 2xy+ 2xz+ 2yz= 400 and grad U= (2y+ 2z)i+ (2x+2z)j+ (2x+2y)k. One is a multiple of the other if [itex]yz= \lambda(2y+ 2z)[/itex], [itex]xz= \lamba(2x+2z)[/itex], and [itex]xy= \lambda(2x+ 2y)[/itex]. That [itex]\lambda[/itex] is the "Lagrange Multiplier".
If you eliminate [itex]\lambda[/itex] from those, you can get immediately that x= y= z: a cube will maximize volume for given surface area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3


Yes, it is possible to find the best dimensions for maximum surface area using mathematical techniques such as optimization. In this case, you would need to use the given surface area formula and set it equal to the maximum volume formula for a rectangular box, which is V = lwh. Then, using calculus or other optimization methods, you can find the values for x, y, and z that would give the maximum volume. However, it is important to note that there may be multiple solutions for the dimensions that would result in the same maximum volume. Additionally, you would need to consider any constraints or limitations, such as the dimensions needing to be positive numbers or within a certain range. Overall, it is definitely possible to find the best dimensions for maximum surface area using mathematical techniques.
 

Related to Best dimensions for maximum surface area

1. What is surface area and why is it important?

Surface area refers to the total area of an object's surface. It is important because it affects various physical and chemical properties of the object, such as absorption, evaporation, and heat transfer.

2. How do you calculate the surface area of an object?

The surface area of an object can be calculated by finding the sum of the areas of all its individual surfaces. For example, the surface area of a cube can be calculated by multiplying the length of one side by itself and then by 6 (since a cube has 6 equal sides).

3. Why is maximizing surface area important?

Maximizing surface area is important because it allows for more efficient interactions with the surrounding environment. For example, a larger surface area can absorb more sunlight, leading to higher rates of photosynthesis in plants.

4. What are the best dimensions for maximum surface area?

The best dimensions for maximum surface area depend on the shape of the object. In general, objects with a larger surface area-to-volume ratio will have a greater overall surface area. For example, a long, thin cylinder will have a greater surface area than a short, fat cylinder with the same volume.

5. How can maximizing surface area be beneficial in scientific research?

Maximizing surface area can be beneficial in scientific research because it allows for more efficient reactions and interactions. For example, in chemistry experiments, using a powdered form of a substance with a larger surface area can lead to faster reactions and more accurate results.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
496
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
4
Views
985
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • STEM Academic Advising
2
Replies
60
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top