Axisymmetric deformation in ANSYS

In summary, the conversation discusses using ANSYS to find the force needed to compress a cylindrical sample of soft tissue by 0.5 mm. The attempt at a solution involves adding element types, defining material properties, and applying constraints and deformations. The solution initially appears incorrect but is corrected by removing a constraint and adding a new one. There is also a discussion about calculating the load needed for the desired deformation.
  • #1
atlamillia
4
0

Homework Statement


A cylindrical sample of soft tissue, with diameter = 8 mm, height = 6 mm, is firmly
glued to two steel compression plates. Using axisymmetric
elements, find the force needed to compress the sample by 0.5 mm. For the purpose of
this problem you may assume that E = 1 kPa, ν = 0.45. If possible, verify your FE
solution using a back-of-the-envelope type calculation.

Homework Equations


This is a question about using ANSYS, so equations are not performed by hand.

The Attempt at a Solution


In the preprocessor, I add an element type, quad 4-node, change it to axisym.
I go to material properties, define a structural> linear> elastic> isotropic material with E = .001 (N/mm^2) and v = .45
I model a 4x6 area rectangle at 0,0.
I mesh it using meshing>mesh>areas>free, maybe refine it a little
In solution, I put a symmetric constraint on the side that intersects the y-axis.
I constrain the top and bottom from deforming by setting def x = 0
I apply a deformation of -0.5 to the top surface.
I solve...

The structure does not appear to deform at all!
The stress graph shows some extremely small (.1E-10) stresses. I know this is not correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
atlamillia: Try these changes. Remove the symmetric constraint at the side that intersects the y axis. At the bottom end of the cylinder, add a constraint def y = 0. Rerun. Let us know what happens.
 
  • #3
Thanks! It seems to be working now, and the values appear to be in the correct range. Looks like those axisymmetric modeling tutorials came back to bite me, I'm glad I asked.

Not nearly as important, but do you know offhand if there is a way to get ANSYS to tell me directly what load I would have to apply to get this deformation, or is it best to calculate it from the stress (what I was planning on doing)?
 
  • #4
atlamillia: Perhaps see if you can display, plot, or read the y-direction element force at each y = 0 node or element. If so, add them together to obtain the total y-direction force on the bottom end of the cylinder. Or perhaps see if you can display, plot, or read the y-direction reaction force at each y = 0 node constraint (?). Please let us know what you find.
 
  • #5
Based on the given information, it seems that the solution may not be accurate due to the extremely small stresses and lack of deformation in the structure. It is possible that the element type or material properties were not properly defined in ANSYS, resulting in an inaccurate solution. It may be helpful to double check the inputs and make sure that the model is properly constrained and loaded. Additionally, it may be beneficial to verify the solution using a back-of-the-envelope calculation, as this can help identify any potential errors in the ANSYS model. If the solution still seems incorrect, it may be necessary to adjust the model or seek further assistance.
 

Related to Axisymmetric deformation in ANSYS

1. What is axisymmetric deformation in ANSYS?

Axisymmetric deformation in ANSYS refers to a type of finite element analysis that simulates the deformation of a structure or object in only one plane of symmetry. This means that the geometry and loading conditions are symmetric about an axis, allowing for simplification of the analysis and faster computations.

2. How is axisymmetric deformation different from 3D deformation in ANSYS?

The main difference between axisymmetric deformation and 3D deformation in ANSYS is the number of dimensions being considered. Axisymmetric deformation only takes into account one plane of symmetry, while 3D deformation considers all three dimensions. This means that 3D deformation is more accurate, but also more computationally intensive.

3. What types of structures are suitable for axisymmetric deformation analysis in ANSYS?

Axisymmetric deformation analysis is most suitable for structures that have a circular or cylindrical shape, such as pipes, cylinders, and spheres. It can also be used for structures with rotational symmetry, such as gears and turbines.

4. What are the advantages of using axisymmetric deformation analysis in ANSYS?

There are several advantages to using axisymmetric deformation analysis in ANSYS. These include faster computation times, simplified setup and modeling, and the ability to study the behavior of structures under rotational loading. It is also a good option for structures that are difficult to model in 3D due to complex geometry.

5. Are there any limitations to using axisymmetric deformation analysis in ANSYS?

Yes, there are some limitations to using axisymmetric deformation analysis in ANSYS. This method is not suitable for structures with non-cylindrical shapes or those with complex loading conditions that cannot be simplified to a single plane of symmetry. Additionally, the results may not be as accurate as 3D deformations, especially for structures with non-uniform deformation patterns.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
996
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
960
Back
Top