Second Derivative of Abs(x) | Richard Seeking Answer

  • Thread starter robousy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Derivative
In summary, the conversation discusses the second derivative of the absolute value function and how it can be proven using the Mean Value Theorem. The conversation also mentions the existence of delta functions in the answer and how the derivative of |x| is undefined at x=0. The conversation then delves into the concept of distributions and how the derivative of |x| can be represented using the Dirac delta function. Finally, there is a discussion about differentiating step functions and the relationship between the first and second derivatives.
  • #36
|x| is not differentiable at x = 0. If you look at the definition of the derivative you can see why. The derivative is defined as the instantaneous rate of change at a given point (x). In order words, the derivative is the slope of the tangent line at that point. In |x|, at x = 0, you can create a infinite number of tangent lines. Because of that you can't find a single value for the slope of the tangent line. That is why is it non-differentiable at that point. If you wanted to find the derivative of |x| than you would have to look at it as a piece-wise function (ie, break it up into two functions). Find the derivative before x=0 and after x=0. But remember the derivative will not be defined at x=0. You can use this same method for finding the derivative of any absolute value function. Break up the function into a piece-wise function, find the domain of each of those functions, and than find the derivative in that domain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #37
Well... I guess Finney can be wrong... In his Calc book he explicity stated that |x| derivate is what someone already said on here...
 
  • #38
matt grime said:
floor(1/xpi) would seem useful if you were actually to want to do anything as dull as work something out explicitly
Riiight, well I seem to have failed in making my point all together. My point was that dealing with it a section at a time for a sufficiently hard equation would be very difficult, so here is a sufficiently ridiculous example:

[tex]y = \left| \sin \left( \frac{\sqrt{2}}{x^{ \frac{\pi}{e}}} \right) + \frac{e^{x^\frac{1}{2}}}{\pi} \right| - |x|[/tex]
 
  • #39
finney is about as trustworthy as nixon (well perhaps not, but it certainly isn't very good), but perhaps it states what the derivative is at all points except 0.

and, zurtex, can you tell me what the derivative is of your function with your formula? since that requires you to know where the zeroes are, just as my notional method would do, i don't see that there's any difference at all, in fact. note, that as the function you've given is not of the form |f|, then your formual does not apply, unless you prove some further results about additivity, which don't seem obvious.
 
Last edited:
  • #40
Fine fine, but do you at least except that my method works?
 
  • #41
i believe I've repeatedly said that except at points where things are zero your method gives the right answer, but that at zeroes you still need to be careful, and not the additional comment that the example you give is not of the form |f| so it doesn't constitute a validd function for your method
 
  • #42
matt grime said:
i believe I've repeatedly said that except at points where things are zero your method gives the right answer, but that at zeroes you still need to be careful, and not the additional comment that the example you give is not of the form |f| so it doesn't constitute a validd function for your method
kk thanks :smile: I might look at writing something up as a method to actually make it easy.

But you can simply apply the standard result:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx}(u-v) = \frac{d}{dx}(u) - \frac{d}{dx}(v)[/tex]

And then use the formulae I gave earlier to work out both.
 
  • #43
how do you know that formula applies at points where u and v aren't differentiable? hint: you don't, it doesn't
 
  • #44
matt grime said:
how do you know that formula applies at points where u and v aren't differentiable? hint: you don't, it doesn't
What?

Are you saying that:

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} \left( \frac{1}{x} - x^2 \right) \neq \frac{-1}{x^2} - 2x[/tex]

Because it is not differentiable at the point x = 0 :confused:
 
Last edited:
  • #45
the function you've written down isn't even defined at 0, so i think asking for its derivative there is a little unreasonable.

i am not talking about the points where a function's derivative is defined, but the points where it is not defined.
 
  • #46
matt grime said:
the function you've written down isn't even defined at 0, so i think asking for its derivative there is a little unreasonable.

i am not talking about the points where a function's derivative is defined, but the points where it is not defined.
:frown: Sorry I clearly don't have enough understanding of calculus because I don't see what is wrong, I'll let it go now.
 
  • #47
f(x) = |x|

lim f(x) = 1
x -> 0+

lim f(x) = -1
x -> 0-

Lateral limits are not equal, so the function is not derivable in x = 0.
 
  • #48
the second derivative of |x| at x=0 is infinite.
and the first derivative at x=0 is undefined
 
  • #49
I'd like to start by saying I agree with everything said above so far, |X| is not differentiable at X=0, but from the OP he's interested in a Quantum Mechanical situation. In QM we can (nay, we are compelled to based on our need for a rigged hilbert space as a basis) use generalized distributions and not functions.

Graphically picture |X|, notice that, as above, its derivative at X<0 is -1 and X>0 is +1. Granted. What about X=0? Well, its not differentiable there. As you zero in on it (As someone has also done above) you notice X->0+ = 1 and X->0- = -1. What generalized distribution do you know looks like this? The Heavyside function! θ(X) ! (There are vastly more rigorous solutions out there using these).

Now what is the derivative of the Heavyside function? Naturally it is also discontinuous (these distributions sure are troublesome), but if you were to examine its slope at 0 it jumps from -1 to 1 rather quickly. This suggests a function who is 0 at all points |X|>0 except exactly at 0 where it diverges. This looks like another friendly distribution, the Dirac delta function!

I apologize for my lack of rigor above. :-)

Edit: Wow sorry to bump this up from 2004, it was just a result on the ol' google search, figured I would add what I learned in QM.
 
  • Like
Likes blue_leaf77
<h2>1. What is the second derivative of the absolute value of x?</h2><p>The second derivative of the absolute value of x is undefined at x = 0 and equal to 0 for all other values of x.</p><h2>2. How do you find the second derivative of the absolute value of x?</h2><p>To find the second derivative of the absolute value of x, you can use the definition of the derivative and the chain rule. The result will be undefined at x = 0 and equal to 0 for all other values of x.</p><h2>3. What is the graph of the second derivative of the absolute value of x?</h2><p>The graph of the second derivative of the absolute value of x is a straight line with a slope of 0 for all values of x, except at x = 0 where it is undefined. This means that the graph is a horizontal line passing through the origin.</p><h2>4. What is the significance of the second derivative of the absolute value of x?</h2><p>The second derivative of the absolute value of x represents the rate of change of the slope of the graph of the absolute value of x. It helps determine the concavity of the graph and the points of inflection.</p><h2>5. Can the second derivative of the absolute value of x be negative?</h2><p>No, the second derivative of the absolute value of x cannot be negative. It is either undefined at x = 0 or equal to 0 for all other values of x, which means it is always non-negative.</p>

1. What is the second derivative of the absolute value of x?

The second derivative of the absolute value of x is undefined at x = 0 and equal to 0 for all other values of x.

2. How do you find the second derivative of the absolute value of x?

To find the second derivative of the absolute value of x, you can use the definition of the derivative and the chain rule. The result will be undefined at x = 0 and equal to 0 for all other values of x.

3. What is the graph of the second derivative of the absolute value of x?

The graph of the second derivative of the absolute value of x is a straight line with a slope of 0 for all values of x, except at x = 0 where it is undefined. This means that the graph is a horizontal line passing through the origin.

4. What is the significance of the second derivative of the absolute value of x?

The second derivative of the absolute value of x represents the rate of change of the slope of the graph of the absolute value of x. It helps determine the concavity of the graph and the points of inflection.

5. Can the second derivative of the absolute value of x be negative?

No, the second derivative of the absolute value of x cannot be negative. It is either undefined at x = 0 or equal to 0 for all other values of x, which means it is always non-negative.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
977
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
192
Replies
1
Views
832
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top