- #1
lavster
- 217
- 0
if I have a sinusoidal trace on an oscilloscope (v vs t) and I wanted to find the area under the wave form squared graph I could integrate the sqaured waveform with respect to t.
but since i don't have the integration facility... is it fair to say that the area under the graph is proprtional to vrms^2 ?
im confused to what vrms is? the average v^2 value (i know its Vpeak/2)
thanks
but since i don't have the integration facility... is it fair to say that the area under the graph is proprtional to vrms^2 ?
im confused to what vrms is? the average v^2 value (i know its Vpeak/2)
thanks