- #1
cj
- 85
- 0
I know a bit about evidence supporting
special relativity (muon decay, synchronized
cesium clocks, etc.) and general relativity
(perihelion of Mercury, etc.).
BUT - is SR and GR considered "proven" or,
in the minds of mainstream physicists, is
the jury still out?
special relativity (muon decay, synchronized
cesium clocks, etc.) and general relativity
(perihelion of Mercury, etc.).
BUT - is SR and GR considered "proven" or,
in the minds of mainstream physicists, is
the jury still out?