Are Coherent Superposition Particles Considered Conservative Systems?

They are in a state of coherent superposition between the source and the screen, meaning they are neither fully particles nor fully waves. This state is often referred to as "limbo" and it raises the question of whether or not these particles can be considered conservative systems since they are not interacting with their environment. On the other hand, any exchange of energy or interaction with other particles can be seen as a measurement. In summary, the particles in flight are not interacting and are in a state of coherent superposition, which raises questions about their classification as conservative systems and the definition of measurement.
  • #1
LarryS
Gold Member
349
33
Say we have a stream of particles, emitted from a source, traveling freely in one direction and then colliding with some sort of screen.

Between the source and the screen the particles are said to be in that indefinite state of limbo known as coherent superposition. Do the particles in this state, since they are not interacting with their environment (other particles), meet the definition of "conservative systems"?

Conversely, does EVERY exchange of energy (interacting with other particles) constitute a "measurement"?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, Are they (the particles in flight) interacting or not ?
DaTario
 
  • #3
DaTario said:
Hi, Are they (the particles in flight) interacting or not ?



DaTario

The particles in flight are not interacting.
 

Related to Are Coherent Superposition Particles Considered Conservative Systems?

1. What is energy and why is it important?

Energy is the ability to do work, and it is important because it is essential for all forms of life. It powers our daily activities, from running our electronic devices to fueling our bodies.

2. How is energy measured?

Energy is measured in joules (J) in the International System of Units (SI). Other common units of energy include calories and kilowatt-hours (kWh).

3. What is the difference between potential and kinetic energy?

Potential energy is stored energy that has the potential to do work, while kinetic energy is the energy an object possesses due to its motion. An object's potential energy can be converted into kinetic energy when it is in motion.

4. How does energy transfer from one form to another?

Energy can be transferred from one form to another through different processes such as mechanical work, heat transfer, and electromagnetic radiation. For example, when we turn on a light bulb, electrical energy is converted into light and heat energy.

5. What are some renewable and non-renewable sources of energy?

Renewable sources of energy include solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and biomass energy. Non-renewable sources of energy include fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas, as well as nuclear energy.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
916
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
408
Replies
12
Views
231
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
580
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
924
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top