Anytime I interact with other people, reality is more concrete. It is when my mind is left to its own devices that I ever begin to question reality. Shared experience with others is a way of determining that reality exists (if everybody did everything I expected them to, I would start questioning reality BIG TIME).honestrosewater said:
If everybody thought alike, nobody would need ME!honestrosewater said:
(love these new smileys!)They should make a smiley for that!loseyourname said:
honestrosewater said:
Perfection is a highly unstable state. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle says your perfection would eventually diminish, then you would be left with imperfect omnipotence.THANOS said:
Phi For All said:
:rofl: :zzz: :uhh: :surprise: 
:grumpy: 
:shy: :tongue2:THANOS said:
Rachel believes that the most convincing aspect of reality is the existence of empirical evidence. This includes scientific experiments, observations, and data that can be objectively measured and verified.
Rachel defines "unconvincing" as anything that lacks sufficient evidence or logical reasoning to support its existence or validity in reality. This can include subjective beliefs, conspiracy theories, and pseudoscience.
Rachel values critical thinking because it allows for a thorough and unbiased evaluation of evidence and claims about reality. It helps to avoid falling for false information or unsupported beliefs.
Rachel acknowledges that personal biases can greatly influence one's perception of reality. These biases can lead to cherry-picking evidence, confirmation bias, and a reluctance to accept information that goes against one's beliefs.
No, Rachel does not believe that there is a single objective truth in reality. She recognizes that our individual experiences and perceptions can shape our understanding of reality, and that different people may have different interpretations of what is true.
