Approximating the gamma function near x=-3

In summary, the conversation discusses problem 1.16 about the gamma function and its values for different values of x. The identity x\Gamma(x)=\Gamma(x+1) is mentioned and used to approximate the gamma function for x near 0 and -1. The conversation ends with the realization of a mistake and the agreement with the given answer.
  • #1
theumbrellaman
2
0
I've just started self studying James Nearing's "Mathematical Tools for Physicists" (available at http://www.physics.miami.edu/~nearing/mathmethods/mathematical_methods-three.pdf), and I'm having trouble with problem 1.16 about the gamma function, defined for positive x as [tex]\Gamma(x)= \int_0^\infty t^{x-1}e^{-t}\,dt.[/tex]

The problem asks
What is the gamma function for x near 1? 0? -1? -2? -3? Now sketch a graph of the gamma function from -3 through positive values. Ans: Near -3, [itex]\Gamma(x)≈-1/(6(x+3))[/itex]

The problem also suggests to make use of the identity [itex]x\Gamma(x)= \Gamma(x+1)[/itex]. Earlier in the text he mentions how, since [itex]\Gamma(1)=0!=1[/itex], using the identity above we can make the approximation for x near 0: [itex]\Gamma(x)≈\frac{\Gamma(1)}{x}=\frac{1}{x}[/itex].

I've tried to replicate this technique by approximating [itex]\Gamma(x)[/itex] near -1 as [itex]\Gamma(x)=\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x}≈\frac{1/(x+1)}{x}=\frac{1}{x(x+1)}.[/itex] Continuing in this manner leads to [itex]\Gamma(x)≈1/(x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3))[/itex] for x near -3, which doesn't agree with his answer. Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are on the right track, and nearly done:
Close to -3, what is x(x+1)(x+2) approximately?
 
  • #3
theumbrellaman said:
[itex]\Gamma(x)≈1/(x(x+1)(x+2)(x+3))[/itex] for x near -3, which doesn't agree with his answer.
It agrees !
 

Attachments

  • Gamma.JPG
    Gamma.JPG
    6.2 KB · Views: 469
  • #4
haha wow can't believe I didn't notice that. thanks!
 
  • #5


I would first like to commend you on your efforts in self-studying and working through the problems in Nearing's book. It is great to see individuals taking initiative and exploring mathematical concepts on their own.

Regarding problem 1.16 about the gamma function, it is important to note that the gamma function is not defined for negative integers. Therefore, the approximations for x near 0, -1, -2, and -3 are not applicable.

However, for x near -3, the approximation given in the problem, \Gamma(x)≈-1/(6(x+3)), is correct. This can be derived using the identity x\Gamma(x)= \Gamma(x+1) and the fact that \Gamma(1)=1. Therefore, for x near -3, we have \Gamma(x)≈\frac{\Gamma(x+1)}{x}≈\frac{1}{x}=-\frac{1}{6(x+3)}.

The graph of the gamma function from -3 through positive values would look something like this:

[insert graph here]

As x approaches -3 from the left, the gamma function approaches negative infinity. As x approaches -3 from the right, the gamma function approaches positive infinity. This is because the gamma function has a pole at x=-3, meaning it is undefined at that point.

I hope this helps clarify the approximation for the gamma function near x=-3 and the graph of the function. Keep up the good work in your self-studying journey!
 

Related to Approximating the gamma function near x=-3

1. What is the gamma function?

The gamma function is a mathematical function that is commonly used in statistics and calculus. It is defined as the integral of the exponential function with the variable raised to a power, and is denoted by the Greek letter "Γ".

2. Why is approximating the gamma function near x=-3 important?

Approximating the gamma function near x=-3 can be useful in solving various mathematical problems, such as calculating probabilities in statistics or finding the area under a curve in calculus. It can also help in simplifying complex equations and making them easier to solve.

3. How is the gamma function approximated near x=-3?

There are various methods for approximating the gamma function near x=-3, such as using the Stirling's approximation, the Lanczos approximation, or the Taylor series expansion. These methods involve using a series of mathematical operations to estimate the value of the gamma function at this specific point.

4. What is the significance of x=-3 in approximating the gamma function?

The value of x=-3 is significant in approximating the gamma function because it is a point where the function has a singularity, meaning that it is undefined. Therefore, finding an approximation at this point can be challenging but also necessary in certain mathematical applications.

5. Are there any limitations to approximating the gamma function near x=-3?

Yes, there are limitations to approximating the gamma function near x=-3. The accuracy of the approximation depends on the chosen method and the specific values of x and n (the power in the gamma function). Additionally, the approximation may not be valid for values of x that are far from -3.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
493
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
953
  • Classical Physics
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top