Amount of nitrogen needed to flush a pipe

In summary, the conversation discusses a problem where the goal is to flush a pipe filled with oil using N2 cylinders. The pipe is 0.5" in diameter and 1050m long, and the volume of oil is 0.133 m3. The pressure reducer can be set from 0-10 bar, and the height of the oil is 50m + 1 bar. The conversation explores various options and calculations for determining the number of N2 cylinders needed, with a focus on understanding the gas volumes and pressures. The experts suggest using Boyle's Law and considering the hydrostatic pressure of the oil in the pipe. Ultimately, it is determined that the pressure in the cylinder needs to be slightly higher than the hydro
  • #1
rednass
Hello,

I am trying to solve a problem where I want to know how many cylinders of N2 (50L, 200 bar) are needed to flush a pipe filled with oil.
The pipe diameter is 0.5", so the volume of the pipe is 0.133 m3 (with a length of 1050m) which is filled with oil.
Behind the N2 cylinders is a pressure reducer which can be set from 0-10 bar.
How can I calculate the number of cylinders I need of N2?
I need to overcome the height of 50m + 1 bar, so around 6 bar. Let's say I set the pressure reducer to 10 bar and flush the pipe, then it contains 0.133 m3 @ 10 bar = 1.33 m3 @ 1 bar.
If, let's say the last 15 bar can't be taken out of the cylinder, it contains effectively 9250 L @ 1 bar = 9.25 m3 @ 1 bar.
Can I just compare those two and say 9.25 > 1.33, so only 1 cylinder is enough?
TLLqCI4.jpg


Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I have never needed to do this but wouldn't it be cheaper to do it with compressed air from a compressor (@6bar+), initially and just clean it out with a few pipe volume's worth of N2 at the end? The N2 would be at low pressure, once the oil is gone.
 
  • #3
Yes, that is also an option, but now I am actually interested in the case where only N2 is used!
 
  • #4
Something that struck me. I am a little obsessed with the energy stored in compressed gases. If you try to blow the oil out I think you could have a problem.
 
  • #5
If you could lower a force pump down to the bottom, you could have a safer situation. It may be cheaper, too.
You must avoid being too committed to one particular solution and look at all possibilities with an open mind. [emoji4]
 
  • #6
Yes, that is totally true. But for now, I just want to understand my own problem and I am getting stuck in understanding it. I'm not sure whether my steps and calculations are right or that I am missing something ;)
 
  • #7
Well, the basics of the gas volumes and pressures are straightforward. The pressure at the bottom is from the vertical column of oil. Boyle's Law will tell you the volume of compressed gas at 200 Ats that will occupy the volume of the pipe (one vertical plus the horizontal length) at the necessary pressure (if the temperature stays more or less constant). A small excess pressure will push the oil out of the top. Once the oil starts to be expelled ( if no bubbles have formed), the hydrostatic pressure will go down as the height of the column and the gas pressure will drop according to Boyle's law. It won't change a lot because of the small total volume of the pipe.

The hydrostatic pressure will approach zero (plus 1 At, of course) and the gas pressure in the pipe will not change much if there is 1000m of horizontal section (1030m of gas goes to 1080m. I think the volume that you need to consider which needs to be at 50m of oil hydrostatic pressure is the 1030 length (vertical down pipe plus horizontal run) - the gas will then expand into the upward 50m section of pipe and no more needs to be pumped in.
The 'pressure reducer' would be followed by a simple tap which should be shut off as soon as oil starts to emerge. All that is necessary is for the pressure reducer to output a pressure which is a bit in excess of the 50m + 1 At and nothing too 'exact' and that's only for safety reasons, I think. (You could in principle use the 200 At bottle directly if you were careful about controlling the gas out of it. You wouldn't want to burst the pipe! You should never have 10At of pressure in the pipe; just enough (your 6Ats estimate)
 
  • #8
Ok, let's break it down. Boyle's law: pV=nRT and let's assume nRT=constant for the N2 quad. That would mean that pV = constant as well and is equal to 200 bar * 50 L = 200 bar * 0.05 m3. So let's assume I want to output the N2 at 10 bar, then I would have p2*V2=p1*V1, so p2=200 bar * 0.05 m3/10 bar = 1 m3?
This would mean that I have enough N2 in 1 cylinder as the volume of the pipe is 0.133 m3?

And so I would need a second cylinder of N2 when the length exceeds 8000m? The volume of the pipe would become 1.013 [m3], so this is larger than the 1m3 calculated and thus I would need a second cylinder?

Am I right in these calculations?
 
  • #9
rednass said:
Am I right in these calculations?
Boyle's Law says P1V1 = P2V2 (when the temperature is held constant.
About the 10Ats thing. You have to ask yourself if the pressure will ever need to reach 10Ats. If you let the tap open with a bang then yes. But would you want to do that? It would just accelerate the oil at a high value, sending it out of the end of the pipe at an excessively high speed and that is not necessarily a good thing - probably a bad thing (?). The working pressure in the pipe needs to be no more than a little greater than the hydrostatic pressure for 50m of oil. This is why I say that you do not need the volume at 200 At that you think you do.
So I would say that your calculation should be on the lines of
Pressure in Cylinder X Required Volume of Cylinder > Volume of 30m + horizontal run X Hydrostatic Pressure of 50m vertical
Notice I have not included your 10Ats figure because it should/need never apply.
 
Last edited:

Related to Amount of nitrogen needed to flush a pipe

1. How much nitrogen is needed to flush a pipe?

The amount of nitrogen needed to flush a pipe depends on the length and diameter of the pipe. Generally, 1-2 pounds of nitrogen per 100 feet of pipe is sufficient for flushing.

2. Why is nitrogen used to flush pipes?

Nitrogen is used to flush pipes because it is an inert gas, meaning it does not react with other substances. This makes it safe to use in pipes and it helps to remove any oxygen, moisture, or other contaminants that may be present.

3. Can any type of nitrogen be used for flushing pipes?

No, only high purity nitrogen (99.9%) should be used for flushing pipes. Using lower purity nitrogen can introduce impurities into the pipe, which can cause corrosion and other issues.

4. Is it necessary to use nitrogen when flushing pipes?

Using nitrogen when flushing pipes is not always necessary, but it is recommended for certain situations. For example, if the pipes will be used for sensitive materials or if there is a risk of corrosion, using nitrogen can help prevent these issues.

5. How do you determine the appropriate amount of nitrogen for flushing a pipe?

To determine the appropriate amount of nitrogen for flushing a pipe, you can use a flow meter or pressure gauge to measure the flow rate and pressure of the nitrogen. This will help ensure that the correct amount is being used for the specific pipe and flushing process.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
786
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
2
Views
901
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
529
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
895
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
20
Views
7K
Back
Top