Adjacent Transpositions of Permutations.

In summary, the conversation was about understanding what an adjacent transposition is in relation to permutations and cycles. An adjacent transposition is the swapping of two elements that are next to each other. The product of adjacent transpositions for a specific permutation can be found by working from left to right and using the cycle notation. This was demonstrated by breaking down the permutation (34785) into a product of adjacent transpositions.
  • #1
Ad123q
19
0
Hi,

Was wondering if anyone could explain to me what an adjacent transposition is (in relation to permutations, cycles etc).

I know what a transposition is, eg the product of transpositions for (34785) would be (35)(38)(37)(34).
I don't know what an adjacent transposition is though.

Cheers in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
An "adjacent transoposition" is just the transposition of two adjacent elements. (23) is an "adjacent transposition" because 2 and 3 are right next to each other (adjacent).
 
  • #3
Thanks, so if I was to express (34785) as the product of adjacent transpositions, would this just be (34) ?
 
  • #4
anyone ?
 
  • #5
Ad123q said:
Thanks, so if I was to express (34785) as the product of adjacent transpositions, would this just be (34) ?

No, of course, not. Why would you think it would reduce to just that? (34785) means "3 changes to 4, 4 changes to 7, 7 changes to 8, 8 changes to 5, and 5 changes back to 3". It is a shorthand for the permutation (12345678)->(12473685). Probably the simplest is just to work from left to right: 1 and 2 are fixed so swap 3 and 4 to get (12435678). Now I need to work that "5" back to the last position so use
1) (56) to get (12436578)
2) (57) to get (12436758)
3) (58) to get (12436785)

Now (67) is obvious. It gives (12437685). And finally, (37) gives (12473685), the final result. That is, (34785) is given by (34)(56)(57)(58)(67)(37).
 
  • #6
Writing a cycle as a product of permutations is easy:

(34785) = (34)(47)(78)(85)

But (47) and (85)( =(58) ) are not adjacent, so we rewrite them as:

(47) = [(56)(45)]-1(67)[(56)(45)] = [(45)(56)](67)[(56)(45)]
(58) = [(67)(56)]-1(78)[(67)(56)] = [(56)(67)](78)[(67)(56)]

(Make a drawing to see why this works)

So:

(34785) = (34)(45)(56)(67)(56)(45)(78)(56)(67)(78)(67)(56)

Note: You "follow the permutation" from right to left, in the notation that I use.
 
  • #7
ah, thanks.

Apologies for my ignorance ;)
 

Related to Adjacent Transpositions of Permutations.

1. What are adjacent transpositions of permutations?

Adjacent transpositions of permutations refer to a specific type of permutation operation in which two elements in a sequence are swapped with each other while maintaining the relative order of all other elements. For example, in the sequence (1, 2, 3, 4), an adjacent transposition could result in (1, 3, 2, 4).

2. How are adjacent transpositions of permutations used in mathematics?

Adjacent transpositions of permutations are commonly used in the study of group theory and combinatorics. They are also used in algorithms for sorting and shuffling data.

3. What is the notation used for adjacent transpositions of permutations?

The notation used for adjacent transpositions of permutations is (i j), where i and j are the indices of the elements being swapped. For example, the adjacent transposition (2 4) would swap the second and fourth elements in a sequence.

4. What is the inverse of an adjacent transposition?

The inverse of an adjacent transposition is simply the same operation performed again. For example, the inverse of the adjacent transposition (2 4) would be (4 2), resulting in the original sequence.

5. Can adjacent transpositions of permutations be used to transform any sequence into any other sequence?

No, adjacent transpositions of permutations can only transform a sequence into another sequence that has the same number of elements and the same order of elements. This is because adjacent transpositions preserve the relative order of elements, but do not change the overall structure of the sequence.

Similar threads

  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
7
Views
663
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
5
Views
995
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top