- #1
unholymist
- 5
- 0
A skier starts from a hill 1000m high...
A skier starts from a hill 1000m high. She skies down the slope a distance of 800m and passes a tree. During this time she has covered a horizontal distance of 700m.
a) Calculate her velocity, in km/h, as she passes the tree.
b) Explain why this is such an unreasonable answer.
Energy, Motion, Forces as far as I know.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4481894/%234%20attempt%201058.jpg
That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of. However, I am stuck trying to find mass. In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.
Anyone want to help? :(
Homework Statement
A skier starts from a hill 1000m high. She skies down the slope a distance of 800m and passes a tree. During this time she has covered a horizontal distance of 700m.
a) Calculate her velocity, in km/h, as she passes the tree.
b) Explain why this is such an unreasonable answer.
Homework Equations
Energy, Motion, Forces as far as I know.
The Attempt at a Solution
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4481894/%234%20attempt%201058.jpg
That's what I've done so far. I basically assumed no friction and, using trigonometry, solved for her acceleration parallel to the slope. Then, using the equations of motion, I solved for her final velocity parallel to the slope. Whether that was done correctly I am not sure of. However, I am stuck trying to find mass. In part B it asks to explain why that velocity is so unreasonable. I'm thinking it's because it would imply that her mass is quite huge... but I can't prove it with a number, lol.
Anyone want to help? :(
Last edited by a moderator: