A question that has been perplexing me for a while.

  • Thread starter SunshineR12
  • Start date
In summary, a meteorologist has been researching the dangers of the standard model of homes during severe weather conditions such as snowfall, winds, and tornadoes. The cube-shaped structure of homes makes them susceptible to damage from extreme winds, downbursts, and heavy snowfall. The winds from a tornado can put immense pressure on the outside walls of a home, potentially causing collapse or damage. The formula for wind forces is 0.00256V2 times a shape factor, with an example of a 120mph wind resulting in about 60,000 pounds of pressure on a 20x50 foot wall. The new EF (Enhanced Fujita) scale for rating tornadoes takes into account both wind speeds and damage to structures
  • #1
SunshineR12
2
0
Hello all, as a meteorologist I have recently been trying to put together an advanced report on why the standard model of homes are very dangerous during a period of advance snowfall, winds, downburst, or tornado.

My theory is somewhat simple, but at the same time, very complicated.

Given the normal structure of a home being similar to a cube with a triangular top, I imagine the sides would experience a great amount of force being blasted by even a weak tornado, which can reach wind speeds of around 60-150MPH.

The low end wind speeds can be quite normal in a severe thunderstorm, 60MPH-75MPH winds in a thunderstorm are actually quite common in many areas.

Downbursts are particularly dangerous due to the fact that these come with little to no warning, downbursts frequently reach wind speeds of 100mph or greater.

Here's a diagram of what happens during a downburst.

downburst.jpg


As you can see, the area that would experience the most severe damage would be the initial impact of the downward wind, I'd imagine the pressure put onto a roof would be quite considerable due to the shape, I'm not sure how to explain it, but there is little to no room for the wind to roll off the roof so to say.

The flat surface also comes to play in the dangers of snow, large snowfall amounts can put tremendous weight onto a roof, and ultimately, lead to the collapse.

During a tornado, the period that causes the most damage would be the wind extending from the center of the funnel, which is where the standard cube shaped homes are flawed.

I'd imagine that the winds place a severe amount of pressure on the outside walls, which could lead to the collapse of the walls, or the winds filtering into the house through a weak-spot such as a window or previous crack, and basically exploding the house like an over-inflated balloon.

Here is a chart showing the pressure drop within a strong tornado.

samaras_fig4.gif


Anyways, onto my question, I've tried using the formula provided in a previous thread, but it's a bit confusing, so I was wondering, given a model house of 50 feet long, and 20 feet high, (forgive me if I'm totally off on the size of average homes, I'm just guessing on search results from Google), what would the PSI be on the outside walls given a wind gust of 120MPH?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
SunshineR12 said:
Anyways, onto my question, I've tried using the formula provided in a previous thread, but it's a bit confusing, so I was wondering, given a model house of 50 feet long, and 20 feet high, (forgive me if I'm totally off on the size of average homes, I'm just guessing on search results from Google), what would the PSI be on the outside walls given a wind gust of 120MPH?
Thanks for the meteorology lesson! When I used to work in nuclear power plant design, we used as I recall a tornado wind of 300 mph over a 70 foot length, and tapering down to lesser value on either side of that length! I guess this would be an F5 tornado? I'm not sure for what forces homes are designed...I think for several feet of average density snow on roofs, and I'm not sure about winds. There are also pressure drops and uplift to consider. But as for your question, the formula I use for wind forces is psf = 0.00256V2 times a shape factor, where V is in mph, and the shape factor is 1.6 for a flat surface. Thus a 120 mph wind has a pressure against a flat surface of (.00256))(120)(120)(1.6) = nearly 60 psf, or about 60,000 pounds total on a 20 X 50 foot wall. This formula comes from the drag force equation for average density air. There are also gustfactors and height factors to consider.
 
  • #3
PhanthomJay said:
Thanks for the meteorology lesson! When I used to work in nuclear power plant design, we used as I recall a tornado wind of 300 mph over a 70 foot length, and tapering down to lesser value on either side of that length! I guess this would be an F5 tornado? I'm not sure for what forces homes are designed...I think for several feet of average density snow on roofs, and I'm not sure about winds. There are also pressure drops and uplift to consider. But as for your question, the formula I use for wind forces is psf = 0.00256V2 times a shape factor, where V is in mph, and the shape factor is 1.6 for a flat surface. Thus a 120 mph wind has a pressure against a flat surface of (.00256))(120)(120)(1.6) = nearly 60 psf, or about 60,000 pounds total on a 20 X 50 foot wall. This formula comes from the drag force equation for average density air. There are also gustfactors and height factors to consider.

Previously, you would be correct, but they recently adapted a new system for rating tornadoes, now, not only does it base the rating on wind speeds, but also damage to structures.

A tornado could have wind speeds of 300mph, but be over an open-field, and they'd be forced to rate it the highest an EF-1 due to the lack of damage.

Thanks for the answer, here's a video you might be interested in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5KI63L22UU

It shows a bank being hit by an EF-5 tornado.
 
  • #4
Dang. Glad no-one was in the bank at the time.
Nice vid!
 
  • #6
In addition to Sunshine, I recently saw a documentary (I regret, don't remember by whom but surely you can find out) that explained the error of only considering direct damage by winds. The documentary discussed the investigation why a town had been completely raised from the map, to the surprise of experts. It turned out that in towns the debris from damaged houses act as projectiles that can significantly increase the destructive power, especially if the tornado is slow (for it then collects increasingly more projectiles). You should certainly discuss that effect in your report.
 

Related to A question that has been perplexing me for a while.

1. What is the best way to approach a perplexing question?

The best way to approach a perplexing question is to break it down into smaller, more manageable parts. Start by identifying what exactly is perplexing you and then try to gather more information about the topic. It can also be helpful to discuss the question with others and get their perspectives.

2. How can I find the answer to a perplexing question?

There are many ways to find the answer to a perplexing question. You can conduct research, consult with experts in the field, or experiment and gather data. It's also important to keep an open mind and consider multiple perspectives when seeking an answer.

3. Why is it important to ask questions that perplex us?

Asking questions that perplex us is important because it expands our knowledge and understanding. It challenges us to think critically and can lead to new discoveries and insights. It also helps us to identify gaps in our understanding and areas for further exploration.

4. How can I determine if a question is worth pursuing?

A question is worth pursuing if it has the potential to provide valuable insights or solutions. You can determine this by considering the relevance of the question, the resources and time required to pursue it, and the potential impact of finding an answer. It's also important to consider your personal interest and motivation in pursuing the question.

5. What should I do if I am unable to find an answer to a perplexing question?

If you are unable to find an answer to a perplexing question, it's important to not get discouraged. You can try approaching the question from a different angle or seeking out new resources or perspectives. If all else fails, it's okay to accept that the question may not have a clear answer at this time and move on to other questions or topics.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Materials and Chemical Engineering
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Sci-Fi Writing and World Building
3
Replies
96
Views
6K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Back
Top