A person walks to the top of the hill

  • Thread starter lolbob07
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Hill
In summary, a 75 kg person expended 5.6 x 10^5 J of energy to walk to the top of a 240 m high hill. The potential energy of the person at the top of the hill is 176400 J. The efficiency of the person in walking up the hill is 31.5%. This implies that there are losses in the system, with the mechanical energy output (at the top of the hill) being only 31.5% of the energy input (5.6 x 10^5 J). The potential energy at the top of the hill is the final output energy. The person's effort (energy expended) is the input in this system.
  • #1
lolbob07
13
0
Just want to make sure If I have solved this question correctly.

Homework Statement


A 75 kg person walks to the top of a 240 m high hill expending 5.6 x 10^5 J of energy/
a. What was the potential energy of the person at the top of the hill?
b. What is the efficiency of the person in walking up the hill?

Homework Equations


Not sure what to write here??

The Attempt at a Solution



Solution to a.
GPE = mgh. M = 75, G = 9.8 m/s, H = 240. ∴ 75 x 9.8 x 240 = 176400 J

Solution to b.
Efficiency = Energy out / Energy in x 100%. ∴ 176400 / 560000 x 100% = 31.5

Is this correct? I am not quite sure...
Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Does an efficiency greater than 100% seem right to you?

It implies a human can create energy by walking up hills...
 
  • #3
billy_joule said:
Does an efficiency greater than 100% seem right to you?

It implies a human can create energy by walking up hills...

No it does not, which is the reason I asked.
Is it referring to how much energy the person uses per metre of walking?
 
  • #4
Where does your figure of 1477350 come from?
 
  • #5
CWatters said:
Where does your figure of 1477350 come from?

Hahahha! Well thanks! I think that solves it :) Just changed it
 
  • #6
I agree:

75 x 9.8 x 240 = 176400

lolbob07 said:
Is it referring to how much energy the person uses per metre of walking?

It tells you about the losses in a system.

e.g. petrol motors are around 20-30% efficient; that is to say the mechanical energy output (at the crankshaft) is only 20-30% of the chemical energy (petrol) input, the rest is lost as heat, sound etc

You need to identify what the input and output in your system is.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
billy_joule said:
I agree:

75 x 9.8 x 240 =/= 176400
It tells you about the losses in a system.

e.g. petrol motors are around 20-30% efficient; that is to say the mechanical energy output (at the crankshaft) is only 20-30% of the chemical energy (petrol) input, the rest is lost as heat, sound etc

You need to identify what the input and output in your system is.

Not sure if this is correct. But, is 176400 the input and 383600 is the output (560000 - 176400)? Does the 383600 count as wasted energy?
 
  • #8
lolbob07 said:
Not sure if this is correct. But, is 176400 the input and 383600 is the output (560000 - 176400)? Does the 383600 count as wasted energy?
No on both counts.

Where is the energy used to go up the hill coming from?

What is the final (output) energy once the top of the hill has been reached?
 
  • #9
billy_joule said:
No on both counts.

Where is the energy used to go up the hill coming from?

What is the final (output) energy once the top of the hill has been reached?

No, sorry I can't understand how to identify the input and output.

Is the final output energy the potential energy at the top?
 
  • #10
lolbob07 said:
No, sorry I can't understand how to identify the input and output.

Is the final output energy the potential energy at the top?

Yes.

The persons effort (energy expended) is the input.

I see you've edited your OP, it looks correct now.
 
  • #11
billy_joule said:
Yes.

The persons effort (energy expended) is the input.

I see you've edited your OP, it looks correct now.

lol. I thought you noticed that before. Sorry! It was just a numbers error :/
Thanks for the help.
 

Related to A person walks to the top of the hill

1. What is the purpose of walking to the top of the hill?

The purpose of walking to the top of the hill can vary depending on the person's individual goals. It could be for exercise, to enjoy the view, to explore the area, or to reach a specific destination at the top.

2. How long does it take to walk to the top of the hill?

The time it takes to walk to the top of the hill can vary depending on factors such as the distance, the terrain, and the person's physical abilities. On average, it could take anywhere from 15 minutes to an hour.

3. Is walking to the top of the hill beneficial for physical health?

Yes, walking to the top of the hill can provide numerous physical health benefits. It is a form of aerobic exercise that can improve cardiovascular health, strengthen muscles and bones, and boost overall physical fitness.

4. What are some potential dangers or difficulties when walking to the top of the hill?

Some potential dangers or difficulties when walking to the top of the hill could include steep or rocky terrain, slippery surfaces, encountering wildlife, or getting lost. It is important to plan ahead, wear appropriate footwear and clothing, and be aware of one's surroundings.

5. Can walking to the top of the hill have mental health benefits?

Yes, walking to the top of the hill can have mental health benefits. Being in nature and getting physical exercise can improve mood, reduce stress and anxiety, and promote a sense of relaxation and well-being.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
937
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top