A Dilogarithmic integration by parts

In summary, the logarithmic integral representation of the Dilogarithm, \text{Li}_2(x), |x| \le 1, can be used to prove the reflection formula for the Dilogarithm, which states that \text{Li}_2(x) + \text{Li}_2(1-x) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}-\log x\log (1-x). This is shown by using the definition of the Dilogarithm and the fact that \text{Li}_2(1) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}. There is also a quasi-reflection formula for the Trilogarithm, but it involves $\text{Li}_{3} \
  • #1
DreamWeaver
303
0
From the logarithmic integral representation of the Dilogarithm, \(\displaystyle \text{Li}_2(x)\), \(\displaystyle |x| \le 1\), prove the reflection formula for the Dilogarithm. Dilogarithm definition:\(\displaystyle \text{Li}_2(x) = -\int_0^1\frac{\log(1-xt)}{t}\, dt = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{k^2}\)Dilogarithm reflection formula:\(\displaystyle \text{Li}_2(x) + \text{Li}_2(1-x) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}-\log x\log (1-x)\)Where\(\displaystyle \text{Li}_2(1) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{1}{k^2} = \zeta(2) = \frac{\pi^2}{6}\)Hint:
The clue is in the thread title...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
$$\text{Li}_{2}(x) = -\int_{0}^{x} \frac{\ln(1-t)}{t} \ dt$$

Let $u = 1-t$.

Then

$$ \text{Li}_{2}(x) = -\int_{1-x}^{1} \frac{\ln w}{1-w} \ dw$$

Now integrate by parts.

$$ \text{Li}_{2}(x) = \ln(1-w) \ln(w) \Big|^{1}_{1-x} - \int_{1-x}^{1} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw$$

$$ = - \ln(x) \ln(1-x) - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw + \int_{0}^{1-x} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw$$

$$ =- \ln(x) \ln(1-x) + \frac{\pi^{2}}{6} - \text{Li}_{2}(1-x)$$
 
  • #3
Random Variable said:
$$\text{Li}_{2}(x) = -\int_{0}^{x} \frac{\ln(1-t)}{t} \ dt$$

Let $u = 1-t$.

Then

$$ \text{Li}_{2}(x) = -\int_{1-x}^{1} \frac{\ln w}{1-w} \ dw$$

Now integrate by parts.

$$ \text{Li}_{2}(x) = \ln(1-w) \ln(w) \Big|^{1}_{1-x} - \int_{1-x}^{1} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw$$

$$ = - \ln(x) \ln(1-x) - \int_{0}^{1} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw + \int_{0}^{1-x} \frac{\ln(1-w)}{w} \ dw$$

$$ =- \ln(x) \ln(1-x) + \frac{\pi^{2}}{6} - \text{Li}_{2}(1-x)$$
Nicely done, RV! (Poolparty)

Too bad there's no such easy relation for the Trilogarithm, eh? (Headbang)
 
  • #4
There is a quasi-reflection formula for the trilogarithm, but it also involves $\text{Li}_{3} \left( 1-\frac{1}{x} \right)$. But I'm sure you already knew that.
 
  • #5
Random Variable said:
There is a quasi-reflection formula for the trilogarithm, but it also involves $\text{Li}_{3} \left( 1-\frac{1}{x} \right)$. But I'm sure you already knew that.
That sounds vaguely familiar. Although, to be fair, it's been a very long time since I've worked on Trilogarithmic identities... (Bad mammal! (Headbang) )
 
  • #6
Let

$$f(x)=\text{Li}_2(x)+\text{Li}_2(1-x)$$

By differentiation

$$f'(x)=-\frac{\log(1-x)}{x}+\frac{\log(x)}{1-x}$$

Now integrate to obtain

$$f(x)=-\log(x)\log(1-x)+C$$

Take $x\to 1$ we get $C=\text{Li}_2(1)$

$$f(x)=\text{Li}_2(x)+\text{Li}_2(1-x)=\zeta(2)-\log(x)\log(1-x)$$
 
  • #7
ZaidAlyafey said:
Let

$$f(x)=\text{Li}_2(x)+\text{Li}_2(1-x)$$

By differentiation

$$f'(x)=-\frac{\log(1-x)}{x}+\frac{\log(x)}{1-x}$$

Now integrate to obtain

$$f(x)=-\log(x)\log(1-x)+C$$

Take $x\to 1$ we get $C=\text{Li}_2(1)$

$$f(x)=\text{Li}_2(x)+\text{Li}_2(1-x)=\zeta(2)-\log(x)\log(1-x)$$

That's a beautiful proof, Zaid! Very nicely done... (Rock)
 

Related to A Dilogarithmic integration by parts

1. What is a dilogarithmic integration by parts?

A dilogarithmic integration by parts is a method used in calculus to solve integrals that involve a product of two functions. It involves using the product rule of differentiation in reverse to break the integral into smaller, simpler integrals.

2. When is a dilogarithmic integration by parts used?

Dilogarithmic integration by parts is typically used when the integral involves logarithmic functions or inverse trigonometric functions. It is also useful when the integral involves a product of functions that cannot be solved using other integration techniques.

3. How does a dilogarithmic integration by parts work?

The dilogarithmic integration by parts method involves using the formula ∫u(x)v'(x)dx = u(x)v(x) − ∫v(x)u'(x)dx, where u(x) and v(x) are the two functions in the integral. This formula is applied repeatedly until the integral can be solved.

4. What are the steps to perform a dilogarithmic integration by parts?

The steps to perform a dilogarithmic integration by parts are:
1. Identify the two functions in the integral and assign one as u(x) and the other as v'(x).
2. Find the derivative of u(x) and the integral of v'(x).
3. Apply the formula ∫u(x)v'(x)dx = u(x)v(x) − ∫v(x)u'(x)dx.
4. Repeat this process until the integral can be solved.
5. Finally, substitute the values back into the original integral and solve for the answer.

5. Are there any limitations to using a dilogarithmic integration by parts?

Yes, there are limitations to using a dilogarithmic integration by parts. This method may not work for all types of integrals and can sometimes lead to a more complicated integral. It also requires careful selection of u(x) and v'(x) to ensure the integral can be simplified. In some cases, it may be more efficient to use other integration techniques.

Similar threads

  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
919
Replies
4
Views
530
Replies
1
Views
757
Replies
1
Views
773
  • General Math
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top