Is This Equation Solvable? A Question About Proving a Complex Equation

  • Thread starter totoro
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation discusses a mathematical proof involving the equations (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c) and (1/a^2002)+(1/b^2002)+(1/c^2002)=1/(a^2002 + b^2002 + c^2002). The experts in the conversation explain why the second equation is disproved, rather than proved, and provide counter-examples to support their explanation. One person also suggests a different approach to solve the problem, but it is deemed incorrect. Induction is deemed unnecessary for the proof.
  • #1
totoro
42
0
my teacher gave me a question in the class...

(1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c)
then prove:
(1/a^2002)+(1/b^2002)+(1/c^2002)=1/(a^2002 + b^2002 + c^2002)

can someone help me to prove it?


kian yew.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What conditions are put on a, b, c?


It's fairly easy to prove that (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c)
is never true for a, b, c positive and that, therefore,

(1/a^2002)+(1/b^2002)+(1/c^2002)=1/(a^2002 + b^2002 + c^2002)

is never true for a, b, c real.
 
  • #3
she just gave me this. why it's never true for a,b,c is real?
can't a,b,c be any real numbers
 
  • #4
In general 1/a+1/b+1/c=1/(a+b+c) is not generally true. I am assuming that it is supposed to be a given that it is true for this problem. Is this so?

If so, b=a and c=-a is a workable solution set for the first assumption. However, it is a counter-example for the second equation. The second equation is disproved, not proved.

Njorl
 
  • #5
Actually, the general solution for 1/a+1/b+1/c=1/(a+b+c) is:

a=-b or a=-c or b=-c with no constraint on the other variable.

If the second equation used odd powers instead of even powers, it would be true, given the first equation.

Njorl
 
  • #6
Originally posted by Njorl
If so, b=a and c=-a is a workable solution set for the first assumption. However, it is a counter-example for the second equation. The second equation is disproved, not proved.

Take a+b=0 and let c free. Then the second is satisfied because its trivial. These are indeed the only possible solution types which can be applied to this.
 
  • #7
The second equation is not satisfied, it is disproved. if a+b=0, a=-b.

Then, when each is raised to an even power like 2002, the sign change disappears. An odd power would make it work.

Njorl
 
  • #8
Oh ****! I read 1/(x+y+z)^2002

You're right. Momentaneous offuscation :frown:
 
  • #9
(1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)= (ab+ ac+ bc)/abc so
if (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c) we have
(ab+ac+bc)/abc= 1/(a+b+c)

Now multiply both sides of the equation by abc and a+b+c to "clear the fractions":

(a+b+c)(ab+ac+bc)= abc
Multiply the left side out:
a2b+ a2c+ abc+ ab2+abc+b2c+ abc+ ac2+ bc2= abc.

One of those 3 "abc"s on the left cancels the one on the right so
ab2+b2c+ ac2+ bc2+ 2abc= 0. If a, b, c are all real, this is impossible.

In particular, in (1/a^2002)+(1/b^2002)+(1/c^2002)=1/(a^2002 + b^2002 + c^2002) all the denominators are to even powers and so are positive as long as a, b, are real.
 
  • #10
Originally posted by HallsofIvy
[B so
ab2+b2c+ ac2+ bc2+ 2abc= 0. If a, b, c are all real, this is impossible. [/B]

Okay I followed you to here, but can't see why that is impossible for all reals. Maybe I'm missing something, could you help me out.
 
  • #11
Indeed, that seems to me to be wrong. (Though I might just be mistaken). Can't you rewrite that as 0 = (b + c)(ab+ac+bc) ?
Then clearly if b+c = 0, the equation is correct...
 
  • #12
(1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c)

requires a, b, and c and a+b+c to be non-zero for the divisions to be defined. Said that, we can proceed by passing to a common denominator on the left side

(ab+ac+bc)/abc= 1/(a+b+c)

Now multiply both sides of the equation by abc and a+b+c to "clear the fractions" which is possible only in presence of the previous conditions!

(a+b+c)(ab+ac+bc)= abc

Multiply out the left side

a^2b+a^2c+abc+ab^2+abc+b^2c+abc+ac^2+bc^2= abc.

simplify

a^2b+a^2c+ab^2+2abc+b^2c+ac^2+bc^2+2abc= 0

collect c from all the terms where it appears with power 1

a^2b+ab^2+ac^2+bc^2+(a^2+2ab+b^2)c= 0

recognize square of binomial and collect c^2 terms and ab from the two remaining ones

ab(a+b)+(a+b)c^2+(a+b)^2c= 0

collect (a+b)

(a+b)[ c^2+(a+b)c+ab ]= 0

It easy to see if you that the second term can be rewritten as a product of two binomials and have

(a+b)(b+c)(c+a)= 0

That requires that at least one (but not all three of them, otherwise all should be zeros against our hypotheses) of the following holds

a=-b aut b=-c aut c=-a

For(1/a^2002)+(1/b^2002)+(1/c^2002)=1/(a^2002 + b^2002 + c^2002) all you need to do is to substitute a->a^2002, etc. in this case by the way the previous formulas cannot hold for any number different from zero and hence the equality is always impossible.

Hope this helped
 
  • #13
thanks to all your help, but I'm thinking another way to do it and i don't know how to become this:

first, turn (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c) into
(1/a^2)+(1/b^2)+(1/c^2)=1/(a^2+b^2+c^2) then turn again into (1/a^3)+(1/b^3)+(1/c^3)=1/(a^3+b^3+c^3) and then...
from this i can say that (1/a^n)+(1/b^n)+(1/c^n)=1/(a^n+b^n+c^n). the problem for me is i don't know how to make the first few line that i show above. or this way is wrong? can i use induction method?


kian yew.
 
  • #14
Originally posted by totoro
thanks to all your help, but I'm thinking another way to do it and i don't know how to become this:

first, turn (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c) into
(1/a^2)+(1/b^2)+(1/c^2)=1/(a^2+b^2+c^2) then turn again into (1/a^3)+(1/b^3)+(1/c^3)=1/(a^3+b^3+c^3) and then...
from this i can say that (1/a^n)+(1/b^n)+(1/c^n)=1/(a^n+b^n+c^n). the problem for me is i don't know how to make the first few line that i show above. or this way is wrong? can i use induction method?


kian yew.

Yes it is wrong!
please check my previous answer!

induction here is a useless complication all you need to consider is that is an even power

Dario
 
  • #15
Originally posted by totoro
thanks to all your help, but I'm thinking another way to do it and i don't know how to become this:

first, turn (1/a)+(1/b)+(1/c)=1/(a+b+c) into
(1/a^2)+(1/b^2)+(1/c^2)=1/(a^2+b^2+c^2) then turn again into (1/a^3)+(1/b^3)+(1/c^3)=1/(a^3+b^3+c^3) and then...
from this i can say that (1/a^n)+(1/b^n)+(1/c^n)=1/(a^n+b^n+c^n). the problem for me is i don't know how to make the first few line that i show above. or this way is wrong? can i use induction method?


kian yew.

you wrong
i think this can't use induction
because when n=1, this equation also can't do
so i think maybe a=b=c=1 ...:)
 
  • #16
I guess it doesn't work for anything.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
sorry

sorry...
mistake...a,b,c can't be 1...
because the 1/1 + 1/1 + 1/1 can't be 1/(1+1+1)
haha...so i think this equation are no solve...
 

1. Can someone prove this statement is true?

Proving a statement to be true requires the use of evidence, logical reasoning, and valid arguments. Depending on the complexity of the statement, it may require experimentation or mathematical proof. Without these elements, it is difficult to definitively prove something to be true.

2. How do I know if someone has proven something?

If someone has proven something, they will have presented evidence and logical reasoning to support their claim. This evidence should be verifiable and reproducible by others. Additionally, the proof should be scrutinized by the scientific community through peer review to ensure its validity.

3. Can a statement ever be proven beyond a doubt?

In science, nothing can be proven beyond a doubt. This is because new evidence or advancements in technology can always challenge previously accepted ideas. However, when a statement has been extensively tested and supported by a large body of evidence, it can be considered to be highly probable or accepted as a scientific fact.

4. Is it possible to prove something without evidence?

No, it is not possible to prove something without evidence. Evidence is necessary to support a claim and without it, the statement is simply an opinion or belief. In science, evidence is crucial in establishing the validity of a claim and it must be presented in order to prove something.

5. Can someone prove a statement using only their opinion?

No, a statement cannot be proven using only someone's opinion. While opinions can be valuable in generating ideas and hypotheses, they are not considered evidence. In order to prove a statement, it must be supported by empirical evidence and logical reasoning.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
718
Replies
1
Views
274
Replies
66
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
128
Replies
9
Views
1K
Back
Top