Do virtual particles violate Conservation of Energy?

In summary, the conversation discusses the existence of virtual particles and how they relate to the Law of Conservation of Energy. Virtual particles are created in pairs and can have negative energy and mass, but they do not violate the law as they are short-lived and balanced by the creation of a real particle in the system. It is also mentioned that virtual particles can interact with each other in a way that would seemingly violate the conservation of energy, but this is not the case in modern quantum field theory. The question of whether the law applies symmetrically at the quantum scale is also raised.
  • #1
Hyperreality
202
0
We are all familiar with the Law of Conservation of Energy:

Energy cannot be created nor destroyed

In other words, the total energy in a closed system is constant.

But if the above "axioms" are correct, how does it cope with the existence of virtual particles? In quantum physics, events are described by probability,which means the advent of an event can only be described as "likely" or "unlikely" to happen, but not "impossible". The chance that virtual particles been detected is miniscule, but it does happen, they are created due to the large uncerntainty of energy fluctuation in a very short time interval.

What it struck me is the existence of these enigmatic particles but what is more amusing is that it has negative energy and mass, and it just pops out of nowhere in vacuum and disappears in the next moment. Surely this phenomena violates the Law of Conservation of Energy - "Energy cannot be created nor destroyed", but on the other hand, it might not have for the law of Conservation of Energy also states the total energy in a closed system is constant. Since virtual particles pertain negative energy and mass in vacuum, at the instant a virtual particle appears, another "real" particle would also appear in another place in the system to balance the amount of energy in the system.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Do you have a reference on the negative mass part of what you said? I had not heard that.
 
  • #3
Hyperreality said:
We are all familiar with the Law of Conservation of Energy:

Energy cannot be created nor destroyed

In other words, the total energy in a closed system is constant.

But if the above "axioms" are correct, how does it cope with the existence of virtual particles? In quantum physics, events are described by probability,which means the advent of an event can only be described as "likely" or "unlikely" to happen, but not "impossible". The chance that virtual particles been detected is miniscule, but it does happen, they are created due to the large uncerntainty of energy fluctuation in a very short time interval.

What it struck me is the existence of these enigmatic particles but what is more amusing is that it has negative energy and mass, and it just pops out of nowhere in vacuum and disappears in the next moment. Surely this phenomena violates the Law of Conservation of Energy - "Energy cannot be created nor destroyed", but on the other hand, it might not have for the law of Conservation of Energy also states the total energy in a closed system is constant. Since virtual particles pertain negative energy and mass in vacuum, at the instant a virtual particle appears, another "real" particle would also appear in another place in the system to balance the amount of energy in the system.


Virtual particles are created in pairs, particle and antiparticle such that conservation laws are not violated. Also even so there is energy necessary to create them (the two separated particles have more potential particles when created than when they recombine and annihilate) and this energy is stipulated to come from the uncertainty principle, giving it meaning not just as a limitation on our measurement, but a real physical meaning that particles do not have a definite energy but that the energy is physically uncertain.
 
  • #4
the *definition* of virtual particles directly implies they violate the equation relating energy and momentum, ie they violate at least one of these. Here uncertainty principle enters the game: the violation can stand only during a very small time, about h/E. Because of this, they are called virtual.
 
  • #5
arivero said:
the *definition* of virtual particles directly implies they violate the equation relating energy and momentum, ie they violate at least one of these. Here uncertainty principle enters the game: the violation can stand only during a very small time, about h/E. Because of this, they are called virtual.
So for a very short time there can be an increase of energy/mass. Does this also work in the opposite direction? Can an already existing particle such as an electron or proton blink out of existence for a short period of time?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
So for a very short time there can be an increase of energy/mass. Does this also work in the opposite direction? Can an already existing particle such as an electron or proton blink out of existence for a short period of time?

No it cannot, because proton is not the antiparticle of electron. A positron is the real antiparticle of electron.

Virtual particles are created in pairs, particle and antiparticle such that conservation laws are not violated.

I'm not sure if this argument is valid. When you say virtual particles are created in pairs, does that imply simultaneity? But in the real world there is no simultaneity. So, can two observers in two different frame of references see a different order of events?

The above also rises the question whether the Law of Conservation of Energy is symmetrical at quantum scale?
 
  • #7
Quoting from http://olympus.het.brown.edu/pipermail/spr/Week-of-Mon-20030915/013538.html:

[URL='https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/author/john-baez/' said:
John Baez[/URL]][...]There's an old lousy form of perturbation theory in which virtual particles violate conservation of energy-momentum - that may be what you're thinking about.

But this only survives in popularizations of physics, not what quantum field theorists usually do these days. At least since Feynman came along, most of use a form of perturbation theory in which virtual particles obey conservation of energy-momentum. Instead, what virtual particles get to do that real particles don't is "lie off-shell". This means they don't need to satisfy

E^2 - p^2 = m^2

where m is the mass of the particle in question (in units where c = 1).

In any event, regardless of which form of perturbation theory you use, in actual reality it appears that energy-momentum is conserved even over short durations and short distances (Here I'm neglecting issues related to *general* relativity, which aren't so important here.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #8
Mike2 said:
So for a very short time there can be an increase of energy/mass. Does this also work in the opposite direction? Can an already existing particle such as an electron or proton blink out of existence for a short period of time?

The problem, you can violate energy for a brief lapse of time, or momenta in a short extension of space. But you can not violate charge conservation, so a electron can nor blink out of existence, it only can transform in other particle for such short interval. For instance it could become a virtual W- plus a virtual neutrino, and then both coalescing to make the original electron.

Another example: a quark of charge +2/3 inside a proton becomes a quark -1/3 plus a virtual W-. Then the W-, instead of fusing again with the quark, disintegrates in electron plus antineutrino. This is called, surprise, "beta radiation".
 

1. What are virtual particles and how do they relate to the conservation of energy?

Virtual particles are subatomic particles that can appear and disappear in a vacuum. They are a consequence of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. According to the principle of conservation of energy, energy cannot be created or destroyed. However, virtual particles can temporarily violate this principle, but they must ultimately balance out in a system.

2. How do virtual particles violate the conservation of energy?

Virtual particles violate the conservation of energy by appearing and disappearing in a vacuum, seemingly creating energy out of nothing. This is because they are not actual particles with mass and energy, but rather fluctuations in energy. However, they must always be created in pairs with opposite properties, such as positive and negative charge, which ultimately balances out the energy in a system.

3. Do virtual particles have any real-world effects?

Virtual particles have been observed indirectly through their effects on the behavior of real particles. For example, the Casimir effect, which is the attraction between two uncharged plates in a vacuum, is a result of virtual particles appearing and disappearing between the plates. Additionally, virtual particles play a role in the decay of subatomic particles and in the behavior of black holes.

4. Can virtual particles be detected?

Virtual particles cannot be directly detected because they do not exist in a measurable form. However, their effects can be observed and measured through various experiments and phenomena, such as the Casimir effect mentioned earlier. The existence of virtual particles is also supported by mathematical equations and calculations in quantum field theory.

5. Do virtual particles pose a threat to the conservation of energy?

No, virtual particles do not pose a threat to the conservation of energy. While they may seem to violate the principle, they ultimately balance out in a system and do not create or destroy energy. They are a natural consequence of quantum mechanics and do not pose any threat to our understanding of the conservation of energy.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
982
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
772
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
765
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
924
Back
Top