273 + degree Celsius = Kelvin Why 273?

In summary, the conversion from Celsius to Kelvin is based on the difference in heat between the freezing and boiling points of water, with the Celsius scale choosing the freezing point as zero and the Kelvin scale choosing absolute zero as zero. This leads to a difference of 273 between the two scales.
  • #1
numbb
4
0
Temperature conversion:

273 + degree Celsius = Kelvin

Actually why is that 273? How does one come up with this?

My teacher mentioned gann's law(not sure if this is the one) but i couldn't find anything related to this, which law should it be?
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Simplest approach: draw a plot of a dependence between temperature and volume of a gas. If density of the gas is low enough dependence will be nicely linear and you will find - approximating for a lower and lower temperatures - that at -273.15°C volume should be zero. That suggests -273.15°C is in some way special, doesn't it?
 
  • #3
Here's another way to look at it. The temperature difference between two states is related to the heat added or taken away from the system. So imagine a curve that connects the temperature of the thermal reservoir that the system is in contact with on the x axis, and the heat that can still be extracted from the system on the y axis. The shape of that curve is set by the physics of the system, but in the Kelvin scale, we want the curve to hit zero heat when the temperature is zero (so the curve hits the "origin" of the graph). Now given all this, you can scale (stretch or compress) either axis completely arbitrarily-- it's just the unit of temperature and the unit of energy that controls the scaling of the axes. The unit of energy is chosen some other way and doesn't matter to your question, but the unit of temperature in the Kelvin scale is chosen such that, if the system is water, the difference in temperature between the point where the water freezes and the point where it boils is 100. Once you set that scale, the shape of the curve will dictate that the difference in T between where it freezes, and the origin, is 273. So it is the choice of the 100 for water that sets the 273. The Celsius scale uses the same convention of 100 between freezing and boiling, but it decides to take the zero temperature to be the freezing point. That's why it differs from Kelvin by 273.

So, you are wondering why 273 seems so arbitrary, and it's because the 100 for water is not arbitrary, combined with the desire to make a step in the Kelvin scale correspond to the same difference in heat as a step in the Celsius scale.
 

Related to 273 + degree Celsius = Kelvin Why 273?

1. Why do we add 273 to convert from Celsius to Kelvin?

The Kelvin scale is based on absolute zero, which is the point at which all molecular motion stops. This is equivalent to -273 degrees Celsius. Therefore, adding 273 to the temperature in Celsius allows us to measure temperature in Kelvin, with 0 representing absolute zero.

2. Can't we just use a conversion formula instead of adding 273?

Yes, there are conversion formulas available to convert from Celsius to Kelvin, such as K = °C + 273.15. However, adding 273 is a quick and easy way to estimate the equivalent temperature in Kelvin.

3. Why is 273 used specifically and not another number?

The number 273 is used because it is the difference between the freezing point of water (0 degrees Celsius) and absolute zero (-273 degrees Celsius). This makes it a convenient number for converting between the two temperature scales.

4. Is 273 the only number that can be used for converting between Celsius and Kelvin?

No, there are other numbers that can be used for this conversion, such as 273.15 or 273.16. However, 273 is often used because it is a whole number and makes the conversion easier to remember and calculate.

5. Does this conversion work for all temperatures?

No, the conversion from Celsius to Kelvin using 273 only works for temperatures above absolute zero. Temperatures below absolute zero cannot be measured in Kelvin, as they are not physically possible.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
948
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
526
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
871
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top