- #1
Evil
- 95
- 0
ok...i am quite tired now so pardon me for any errors...let goes
my agruement is that there is no present becos of two reasons.
firstly there is still no clear cut definition for time.hence we cannot define present.it is not an qulaitive value.
second, when one say present it have alredi become a past n so there is no present.
so to sum it all up there is no present no now, but onli past n future becos i tink tis 2 area overlap..
anyone with any other agruements?
my agruement is that there is no present becos of two reasons.
firstly there is still no clear cut definition for time.hence we cannot define present.it is not an qulaitive value.
second, when one say present it have alredi become a past n so there is no present.
so to sum it all up there is no present no now, but onli past n future becos i tink tis 2 area overlap..
anyone with any other agruements?