1A caused by half the charge density at twice the velocity

In summary, the conversation discusses the consequences for the electric field in a steady current of 1A with non-uniform drift velocity along the path, due to non-uniform carrier density. It is noted that in this case, the electric fields will be radial to their sources and will not emit electromagnetic waves. The conversation also mentions that the curl of the electric field will be zero in this case, as it is a steady state field with no time-varying terms. Further, it is discussed that the length contraction due to non-uniform drift velocity will cancel out the convective acceleration of the charge, resulting in a zero curl of the electric field.
  • #1
particlezoo
113
4
In the situation consisting of a steady current of 1A in an arbitrary closed path, what would the consequences be for the electric field if the drift velocity was non-uniform along the path due to non-uniform carrier density?

This would be a case of a "uniform" 1 amp, but where the charge carrier density varies along the conductor which could be due to wire of varying thickness or use of different conductor materials along the path.

Now I understand that, ignoring resistive heating, all the electric fields due to these "idealized" steady currents would be radial to their sources, and so we would not expect the emission of electromagnetic waves.

Now, just because the electric fields are radial to their respective sources does not mean that the curl of those fields are all zero, for after all an isolated charge moving at constant velocity will cause changes in magnetic fields that we know generate the curl of electric fields per the Maxwell-Faraday equation.

If I understand correctly, if I compare two current elements with the only difference being that the second current element has half the charge carrier density at twice the drift velocity, then the difference made on the electric field due to length contraction is not the same and is approximately double compared to that of the first current element. If that is true, then shouldn't we expect that the curl of the electric field would not vanish in the region surrounding a point where such two current elements meet each other?
Kevin M.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In such cases there will be a surface charge density at the interface. If it is a steady state field then, by definition all of the time varying terms will be zero and therefore the curl of the E field will also be 0.
 
  • #3
If the current density J(r,t)=J(r) does not depend on time then the vector potential A(r,t) will be A(r) that is it will not depend on time because it is

##\vec A(r,t)=\int \frac{\vec J(r',t-\frac{|r-r'|}{c})}{|r-r'|}d^3r'=\int \frac{\vec J(r')}{|r-r'|}d^3r'=\vec A(r)##

And since A(r) doesn't depend on time then
##B=\nabla \times A## doesn't depend on time either, hence

##Curl(E)=\nabla \times E=-\frac{\partial B}{\partial t}=0##.
 
  • #4
After some thought, it now appears to me that in the case of static charge/current densities that the curl due to the length contraction due to non-uniform drift velocity of the charge carriers is canceled exactly by the curl of electric field due to the convective acceleration of said charge.
 

Related to 1A caused by half the charge density at twice the velocity

1. What is 1A caused by half the charge density at twice the velocity?

1A is a unit of electrical current, which is the flow of electric charge. The phrase "caused by half the charge density at twice the velocity" refers to a specific scenario where the current is caused by a lower charge density and higher velocity compared to a standard case.

2. How does the charge density affect the current in this scenario?

The charge density, or the amount of electric charge per unit volume, is halved in this scenario compared to a standard case. This means that there is less charge available to flow, resulting in a lower current.

3. Why is the velocity doubled in this scenario?

The velocity, or speed, of the charged particles is doubled in this scenario compared to a standard case. This means that the particles are moving at a faster rate, resulting in a higher current.

4. What is the significance of this scenario in terms of electric currents?

This scenario shows that the current can be affected by both charge density and velocity. In this case, the effects of halving the charge density and doubling the velocity balance each other out, resulting in the same current as a standard case.

5. How does this scenario relate to Ohm's Law?

This scenario does not directly relate to Ohm's Law, which states that the current in a circuit is directly proportional to the voltage and inversely proportional to the resistance. However, it does demonstrate how different factors can affect the current in a circuit, which is a fundamental concept in understanding and applying Ohm's Law.

Similar threads

  • Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Electromagnetism
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
555
Replies
5
Views
936
Replies
35
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
911
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top