Recent content by winhog

  1. W

    Factorial in example problem, I'm confused

    The easiest way to see it is a concrete example I think. Take n as 5... then (n+1)! is 6! , which is 6*5*4*3*2*1. (n+1)n! is the same thing because n+1 is 6, then n! is 5*4*3*2*1, giving you 6*5*4*3*2*1. edit: posted late I guess :rolleyes:
  2. W

    Calculating Piston Height in Equilibrium for an Ideal Gas System

    They give height = 2.4 meters, n = 0.1 mol, mass = 1.4 kg, and that the gas is initially at STP. I calculated the area at 0.93 m^2.
  3. W

    Calculating Piston Height in Equilibrium for an Ideal Gas System

    Hmmm, I'm back to my initial problem then, where my answer comes out to something like 0.2 millimeters. I guess it makes some sense since .1 moles of gas can't hold much up unless very compressed, but I've never been asked a problem with such a ridiculous answer from this book before.
  4. W

    Calculating Piston Height in Equilibrium for an Ideal Gas System

    Sorry, I'm still having trouble. Using your formula, with m = 1.4 kg, T = 273 K, n = 0.1 mol h = (.1)(8.314)(273) / ((1.4)(9.8)) = 16.5 meters. The units all work out and everything, but the given height of the cylinder was only 2.4 meters. I know the piston would not shoot up to...
  5. W

    Calculating Piston Height in Equilibrium for an Ideal Gas System

    Thanks very much! Though, it seems odd that the initial height of the cylinder they gave me was useless...wasn't it? :confused:
  6. W

    Calculating Piston Height in Equilibrium for an Ideal Gas System

    I'm having some trouble with a question involving a piston pressing down on an enclosed gas. I'm given the height of the cylinder, the number of moles of gas, the mass of the piston, and told that initially the gas is at STP. I need to find the height of the piston when the system is in...
  7. W

    3-dimensional potential energy problem

    Thanks for the help guys!
  8. W

    3-dimensional potential energy problem

    If I take the derivative with respect to, say, x, can I assume y and z are constants? If so, I messed up on a pretty simple problem :blushing:
  9. W

    3-dimensional potential energy problem

    Hmmm...I think my problem might be I've never learned how to take a vector derivative and this might be above my head mathematically :confused: Maybe I can separate the potential energy into x and y components...but i really don't know how. I guess since the particle is on the x-y...
  10. W

    3-dimensional potential energy problem

    I have a problem on my homework that says the potential energy of a particle is given by its position in the x-y plane according to P.E. = x^3 + 8x^2 + 34yz and I have to calculate the force on the particle at point (x,y,z), and all equilibrium points. dU = 3x^2 dx + 16x dx + 34y dz +...
  11. W

    Block on an accelerating inclined plane

    Thanks guys, I managed to figure out the answers! :smile: But I'm still having some conceptual problems. I got the vertical components of friction and normal forces, setting them to 0 when added with weight. This allowed me to get the magnitude and direction of all 3 of those forces...
  12. W

    Block on an accelerating inclined plane

    OK...the entire system is going to be accelerating horizontally due to the applied force, so there will be some horizontal force F' on the block..which is unknown. The force of gravity, mg, is known and is 4.9 N downards. The normal force is F(gravity) * sin(35) ... if the block is not...
  13. W

    Special relativity and frames of reference

    Aha, that makes sense. Thanks for clearing that up!
  14. W

    Special relativity and frames of reference

    In that case...why would a person on a spaceship moving quickly age slower than those on earth? (like in the grandfather paradox) Is it simply because the spaceship accelerated while the Earth didn't? Couldn't that also be considered the Earth accelerating away from the spaceship?
  15. W

    Special relativity and frames of reference

    I have learned that objects moving at high velocity experience time dilation, among other things, and that there is no ultimate frame of reference in the universe. If this is so...say two galaxies pass by each other at near the speed of light...in which one would time be moving slower? There's...
Back
Top