Yes! It was the polarized light one. Thanks. I'll try to grok this and the Kim paper reference today. Than you! I hope B was the right destination for "high school help needed" on the phone app and can't find the key that tells which is which.
This seems a lot like the "teach your toddler to read" hugely expensive programs that were based off of a book from the 1970s that cost me $6 on Amazon. It worked. Daughter loved it. Mental math has been out there forever. And, it has some really nice algorithms in it. I wish we taught more...
I get this general thing from students all the time. So, lately, I've been playing Devils advocate-- ok, we will only give math to those who are likely to need it. Let's see, statistically scientists are still most likely to be white males--so let's start there... wow! This is saving us so...
I run a maker space and it has taken a dive into physics recently. I have 2 students doing a quantum entanglement experiment from SciAm and the Spooky Action at a Distance website. And, we have done a simple quantum eraser with polarized light.
All I can tell them is that "physicists say"...
Thanks for this-- what is the original paper? I run a maker space for middle and high school kids and two are doing the SciAm quantum entanglement right now and all I can tell them is that some physicists have a model for the eraser that doesn't require retro causality. Need more. Middle...