Recent content by weirdoguy

Why would he explain if he explicitly asked you to do the research yourself? Did you google suggested phrase?

And if someone does not know what that is, and participate in the discussion, I would assume one would check that in google, and we have three alpha symbols right away:

Maybe, but those discussions serve not only for the OPs, but for a wider group of people. E.g. for me :smile:

Well, I did.

Does any dimensionfull constant have any significance in physics? :wink: Other than adjusting units of course.

Everything is possible and nothing is possible if we don't have any concrete model at hand. In Earths frame of reference it surely does depend on its rotation.

Well, I'm one of those (few?) physicists that do not get excited by that kind of things at all. But I do get "aroused" by the idea of using affine bundles in formulating Newtonian mechanics o0) And I was that way from the very moment I started falling in love with physics, back in high school...

And how would you model this mathematically?

Maybe she will say something good when her views will drop significantly. For me she lost her reliability/credibility even before I knew who she is.

What for?

Our known theories assume continuous spacetime. To derive something in granular spacetime we need models that have it built in. And we don't, at least not developed to the point where we can derive conservation laws.

Oh yes, I agree with that. It's a great book.

If it's not in an energy eigenstate, does it even make sense to consider conservation of energy? If not, then you can't say energy is or is not conserved.

What do you think?

Can you give any reference for that?