Recent content by UltraPi1

This is not the bone I'm picking at. I guess I'm looking for details at the fundamental level.

Because the twin returning would appear as if a magic trick took place. Sr only tells you that the twin comes back younger than the twin that stayed. You can quantify by how much this will happen, but not how this will happen. The reason from my estimates is that to do so, would require the...

Ok the speed of light and the law of physics are the same in all inertial frames, but obviously this falls way short as to why the traveling twin comes back chipper as the day he left, while the stationary twin is having problems with irregularity. Have there been any attempts to quantify this...

I'm thinking there must be some mechanical reason for this. Otherwise this cannot be explianed through physics.

World line? There is no mechanical reasoning here?

Sorry I edited my words.

In other words - Why would someone taking a journey from (a) to (b) at very close to the speed of C and returning back to (a) at very close to the speed of C, with a travel distance of 20 light years be younger than the person that stays at A by 20 years? Why does the traveler not age? What...

Perhaps Chroot would like to explain the why of it all. Why doesn't the captain notice any difference? Why does the person on Earth notice a difference?

I would point out that in our universe there are only ones...one at a time, where time is the nothing ones are composed of. Time exist, but only by conceptual means.

I can equally say this if someone says that reality is physical. The evidence is everywhere apparent. If all of reality is conceptual - How can you miss it? What evidence is there for physical reality that can't also be explained by conceptual means?

I'll chime in once again to say that physical reality is a misdiagnosis. All things thought to be physical, are in reality conceptual entities. That is to say that the Earth is not a physical entity, nor is any other thing that comes to mind. The universe is a purely conceptual entity completely...

Never said that empty space didn't have properties. I said that it's constituents were composed of nothing - As in the kind of nothing that has no properties. It is the form of a component that has the properties, and those properties are not physical. Same could be said for what we term mass...

I cannot prove that nothing exist by physical means. Mostly because your Existence is not physical either. This can only be done by conceptual means. That is to say that Existence is a conceptual entity. It is space-time, which is no more than a form of nothing. It is an extension of what we...

I love this kind of thread. I'm one of those people that cottons to the idea that nothing exists. How else would one get something from nothing?

Would you term a geometric object of nothing as being a physical entity? I would term this as a purely conceptual entity.