Recent content by Trooper149

Now that you have said it, I think I will pursue that approach. I very much threw myself against the wall in treating it as a 3D model and have found myself getting bogged down. Best simplify and start from the ground up. If its ok, can I keep this thread open so I may bounce questions back...

Appreciate the perspectives, it is an ambiguous question hence I am pursuing it. There are many factors that simply are difficult to determine such as: -which muscles (and therefore aspects of total bodily mass) are included as part of the loading weight -which muscles amongst the deep and...

Hi there Many thanks, have done so and have reviewed some of the information: I needed to make a few adjustments so please disregard the previous stats and consider only of what I post now. Athlete Stats: Weight: 75kg Height: 1.9kg Leg Length: 1.15m Length of Hip Girdle to Bottom of Sternum...

Hi all, not exactly a physicist however I am finding that the expertise of those in this field, would be massively appreciated in the field I am currently delving into - exercise science. Specifically an understanding of engineering physics. As described above, in short I am trying to work out...

Much appreciated, cheers

So passive forum slandering aside, could you gentlemen perhaps point me in the direction of some reliable sources of information that can give a breakdown of quantum mechanics for someone who is just starting out? Cheers

Could you advise me of some possible sources of reliable information that provide some more in depth explanations of quantum mechanics for beginners?

An example I am referring to is this Link here. Perhaps not the best source as it comes straight from the internet, in which case I would appreciate any direction towards reliable sources which can provide core understanding and context to the behaviour of particles. They state that the...

Problem Statement: NA Relevant Equations: NA Come across the mentioning that some particles have "no mass". Is this stated by physicists because there simply isn't evidence to prove that they have mass. It doesn't seem logical to make a fact based on absence of information to the contrary...

Problem Statement: NA Relevant Equations: NA So just smashing through some info on particles and I have come across the term "decay" which seems to be used quite ambiguously. Decay is the process where a nucleus expells radiation as a means to redress the imbalance of forces occurring...

Thank you for the informative replies guys and gals

Problem Statement: Are electrons/photons/positrons the smallest quantifiable object? Relevant Equations: NA Would it be correct to say that electrons, positrons and photons are the smallest object with mass? If so would it also be correct to say that they are the primary "holders" of energy...

This is excellent. So quite simply, because energy is measured in joules and joules is squared, they square light in e=mc2 to convert the value?

Problem Statement: Trying to understand the principles for the equation e=mc2. Relevant Equations: E=mc2 So just started at a physics A level and so far loving it. I understand this question has indeed been asked before, however for different reasons. I understand the purpose of e=mc2 and I...