I am having a problem with bibtex when I have a second paper by the same author (or at least the same lead author) in a single year.
For example if I have two papers, with the following authors:
Paper 1 - Author 1, Author 2, Author 3, Author 4 (2008)
Paper 2 - Author 1, Author 5, Author...
Ok I managed to solve the problem.
For anyone else that might be interested:
I was including the package with:
\usepackage{hyperref}
However if I include it with:
\usepackage[dvipdfm]{hyperref}
Then it works when I use dvipdfm to convert to pdf.
I am having some trouble with the hyperref package in terms of it not actually providing links to my internal references.
If I use the pdflatex command to compile my document to a pdf, the links work fine.
However if I use the latex command to compile to a dvi and then dvi2pdf (or whatever...
Ok so it turned out I had multiplied the wrong function on the left. It worked out quite simply when I fixed that. The lecture notes had erroneously shown both functions multiplied on the right.
Thanks, tiny-tim.
I tried that and got something else that didn't work. However I will try again because I was surprised that it didn't work so I may have made a mistake or missed something obvious...
So I am trying to derive the continuity equation:
\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}J^{\mu} = 0
From the Dirac equation:
i\gamma^{\mu} \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}\Psi - \mu\Psi = 0
And its Hermitian adjoint:
i\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{\mu}}\overline{\Psi}\gamma^{\mu} -...
I'm doing an assignment involving an optics question.
There is a lens (diameter 4cm, focal length 5cm) an apeture (diameter 5cm, position 2cm in front of lens) and an object (1.5cm high, 8cm in front of lens).
Now I have determined that the lens is the aperture stop. Now, because the lens...
Ok, so the velocity of mechanical waves through a medium is equal to the square root of some elastic property divided by some inertial property...
I did a quick search on google and a couple of textbooks and cannot find any actual explanation as to why this is. It is intuitive, yes, but...
Ahh yeah I worked it out now...
m1 - m2 = 2.5log(F1/F2)
Just needed to be reminded that absolute magnitude is what the apparent magnitude would be at a distance of 10 parsecs...
Distance modulus derivation
(I hope this is the correct subforum)
I was wondering if anyone can help me, I am hoping to show a derivation of the distance modulus
m - M = 5log(d/10)
It looks very similar to the m = m(sun) - 2.5log((L/L(sun)).(r(sun)/r)^2) so I'm assuming that they...
For a class I'm doing I have an assignment where we have to do a report on a Space Science Instrument.
I am doing Cloud Profiling Radar.
Part of the report has to involve some calculations which basically just apply out knowledge of physics to the properties of the instrument.
The...
(x^n - 1) = (x^(n/2) -1) (x^(n/2) - 1)
= (x^(n/4) - 1)(x^(n/4) + 1)(x^(n/2) + 1)
and so on, where the power of x is n/(2^k).
Consider the case where n is odd, dividing n by 2^k will never equal 1.