So time does not exist as an independent concept?!! It exists only in sense of comparing how many cyles of an event fit in one cyle of another event? Therefore relative?
No matter how you look at time boils down to how many events happen in the span of another event, for example how many times the pendulum swings in the span of a free falling motion of a ball. So time is in a sense measure of how many events that we use as measuring ruler(for example the swings...
Tobe honedt relativity is a simple accurate model with great predictive and explanatory power. I know it's the best we have. But i just donot believe time can be affected or chnged.
The justification for the slow of evey process by the same factor could be justified by saying that object that move fast have large kinetic energy which in itself is mass since mass and energy are the same this will result in every particle in that object being heavier so it moves slower.
Thank you for your help, so what you aresaying is that it is possible that it's not time that slowing but we have no way of distinguishing between a slow in time and a slow in physical processes?
Well said, i did say it is impossible to distinguish between a slow in every physical event and a slow in time. That is right i just am saying this is possible interpretation with which the math would still work the same.
Hi, i am not a physicist but i have the intuition that time dilation is just slow in the movement of particle's and causality instead of slow in time itself and that this does not affect photons. I understand that there is no way to distinguish between a slow in time and a slow in movement and...