Recent content by Sebastiaan

Does this mean you can abreviate a "Celloid of Aluminium in Oxygen" to SolAlO ?

phosphorus mining on the moon could become big one day because phosphorus is non very abundant elsewhere in the solar system.

I could not find the source you are referring to but I got inspiration from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19920006805.pdf https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19910022004.pdf

Ok, so I can conclude there isn't any official chemist convention for Abbreviating a suspension of solid in liquid. SALOX seems like a artificial name to me, I guess I better simply call it AluLOx which serve as a suitable that is at least recognizable as a mixture of Aluminium and Liquid...

I guess you first have to cool the wire below the temperature of the Liquid Oxygen, otherwise, it would release microscopic oxygen gas bubbles in the Liquid Oxygen, which would cause the whole wire to disintegrate.

Yes the Aluminium Nano Particles will be suspended in Liquid Aluminium. Would the abreviation SusAluLOx be clear to a chemist? SusAluLOx : Sus is Chemestry abreviation for suspension, Alu for Aluminium, Lox for Liquid Oxygen

Alright, I'm trying to find out what the Chemical naming convention would be of a Mixture Aluminium (nanoparticles) and Liquid Oxygen. The Mixture is mended as a monopropellant in a lunar rocket engine.

Alright, let's change that, a Tunston reaction chamber with anti reducing coating heating Nitrogen 3500K, will the Nitrogen dissove the anti reducing coating

DiNitrogen is very unreactive due to the tripple bond it has, but what happens if it heated to very high temperature and bonds are broken? does it start behaving as a strong oxidiser. I could not find iinformation on at which temperature this happens but let's assume 3500K in a Tunston reactor...

Alright, so we now calculate the proper acceleration of the LightSail when it is moving straight away from it source, but what happens it is not going straightaway but at 45 Degree angle (to make some coerce corrections), will acceleration still be modified by (v/c)^2 or less (because we are...

So the Doppler redshifting effect alone is responsible for a reduction of 44% in acceleration, that's brutal! Now the remaining question is, besides the Doppler effect, does it also experience a time dilation effect as the vessel mass would appear to increase. It may not be much, but it is still...

Yes I think so, the 0.8 comes from Doppler effect traveling at 0.2c : 1 - (1 - 0.8 / 1) the 1.0002 is the time dilation effect when traveling at 0.2c :1 / Sqrt[ 1 - (v2 / c2) ] so when combined acceleration would be 0.8 / 1.0002 = 0.7998 of initial acceleration

So if I understand you correctly you first calculate the basic Newton dopler effect and then adjust for time dilation meaning a laser sail traveling at 0.2c, would from the initial frame of reference (at beam station) be observed to travel at an acceleration of 0.8 * 1.0002 = 0.800016 of its...

Ok, now I'm confused, so the standard doppler effect math for light can be ignored and instead we only calculate 1/ ##\gamma##2 ? edit: according to the dutch wikipedia, the doppler effect for light can be calculated with which would result in a 10.557% acceleration reduction

It does? Then let's say the lasersail is accelerated to 0.9c, it would receive 90% less power from red shifting alone. Now exactly how to calculate the continued acceleration of the laser as a percentage of maximum acceleration (at start). Here is my attempt: Time Dialation = 1 / Sqrt[ 1 - (v2...