Recent content by rushil

  1. R

    Can someone with a subscription to AJP please PM me this article?

    It's not a problem with earning --- we don't do jobs here in high school... Does somebody already have a subscription here --- in the past many people have Pmed me articles from the AJP when I asked for help... Please help me now fast!
  2. R

    Can someone with a subscription to AJP please PM me this article?

    Hello... I;m sorry if thi sis the wrong page to post this... I despeartely need this article " Number of Images Produced by Multiple Reflection V. M. Kulkarni Walchand College of Engineering, Sangli, Bombay State, India April 1960 -- Volume 28, Issue 4, pp. 317-318 American Journal...
  3. R

    Mass is converted into energy which appears as Binding Energy

    Hey people...can somebody please offer their views on this... FASSSSTTTT...Thanks!
  4. R

    Can the Universe Be Described as a Field?

    I'd just like to ask this... is my idea worth further study and analysis to see if something can be figured out...or is it outright 'wrong!''...also, since I'm not aware much on this subject,,,,can somebody probably give a clearer statement of the problem I am thinking about( as you have...
  5. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    Hey guys,,, why has the discussion stopped! Are these ideas going somewhere? Is this idea worth further study!? Please speak!
  6. R

    Can the Universe Be Described as a Field?

    Thanks... but I'm sorry I don't know much of the terms you used and have no idea on how to quantify my thought! I'm a high school student with a highly wavering mind! :rolleyes:
  7. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    I try to derive that speed of light in Aquasia is NOT independent of motion of emitting body... please see if it is correct. K is an observer on Earth seeing the boxed universe 'Aqausia' . K' is an observer in Aqausia ( stationary) , Let M be a moving object in Aqausai, with speed v. K' can...
  8. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    As far as I thing, Aqua in Aquasia is just the aether! Nothing more , nothing less! Its undetectable but we assume, for now , that it exists! I think doing this is not too much of a 'wrong' given that Modern theoretical physics on Earth has envisioned stranger things! I hope all of us...
  9. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    I have a question regarding the Michaq-moraq experiment conducted in Aquasia! Wouldn't it, if carried out in exactly the same way as on Earth, still yield wrong results if the theory used simple Galilean transformations as on Earth? I think it would... However, here comes the catch. On earth...
  10. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    Aqausians - living in Aqausia - the water filled universe ( please use this name from now!) do not know about 'vacuum' as we call it! Their 'vacuum' is effectively a space filled with Just Aqua - the name for aether in Aqausia! Besides, hoe would they prove for the first time that THERE IS A...
  11. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    Randal has epitomised what I have to say... maybe stuff starts going 'wrong' ( as we would consider it) if the people in this universe applied the formulae using the speed of light they measured. I just want to clarify one thing ( while the great discussion continues! ) - we all agree that if Mr...
  12. R

    Mathematica Famous one on circuits - but more mathematical

    Hey guys, I'm sorry I don't have aceess to the article on mathscinet since I am high schooler in India. Please , can you send me the article by PM or mail!
  13. R

    Could Relativity Still Apply in a Universe Filled with Water?

    I'm sorry - I don't have acceess to the American Journal of Physics coz I am a high school student in India. Can someone Please send the abovesaid article to me . I'd love to see it! :-p
  14. R

    Fallacy in Work-Energy theorem?

    Forget velocities - the block and person are all traveling in the same line , initially , the block and person have Earth frame velocities in the same direction ... hope its OK now!
  15. R

    Fallacy in Work-Energy theorem?

    Rather tha rephrasing the question - can you please state what exactly you did not understand! Thanks!
Back
Top