Your quote of what I said is my response to the moral education made to me by a senior member here...and your comment is another moral education while you could not respond to my argument in scientific term...I am really surprised how proud people here with "physics" aura would argue using moral...
Well, I guess I probably did not phrase it extremely clearly...my concern in this issue is not [in terms of local galaxy dynamics]...I am referring to the logic of using "our observed universe" as a logical concept in general...If CMB could tell us the whole history of the universe since the Big...
The key issue here is that the speed of light which we use to gauge the size of the observed universe is a constant, but the expansion of the universe is accelerating, which mean what lie beyond our current observed universe could be within our observed universe long time ago...but once its mass...
Thanks for your explanation...But I think the key in the issue here is that the speed of light is a constant, but the expansion rate of the universe is not...so what lie beyond our observed universe now might not be beyond our observed universe long time ago...and once the momentum of the...
[ It all takes time. Galaxies currently outside our observable universe may influence us in the future. Currently, neither their light nor their gravitational influence has had time to affect us. ]
But this does not exclude the possibility that our galaxy is rotating around something beyond...
I feel a bit troubled by the use of "our observed universe" as a concept of reason concerning the nature of universe. For example, the following is part of the answer of Halc to my previous question:
[
Rotation around an attractor only works given the causal reach of the mass, so nothing outside...
Thanks for the answers...Maybe I did not make it clear...whether the axis of solar system is tilted about some degree to that of our galaxy is not important as long as the whole mass of the galaxy is in a plate , and whether the axis of this galaxy is tilted to the axis of a bigger system is not...
It seems that all celestial systems are in different plates, e.g. solar system, milky way galaxy, clusters of galaxies...although different systems might have their own plates, it seems to turn out that small systems are always on the plate of a bigger system...so is the whole universe on a big...
Zz:
I guess that you are confusing a lot people here...as a PF MENTOR, I believe you should know the fact that a lot of opinion people are expressing here are NOT published but their own because I don't think this is a place solely for someone to come here to teach others what they have...
darkmatter:
I believe what you said...and I am not sure what you exactly mean by "mature enough as sentient beings", but I do think it would be possible for someone to exploit the very possible chance to turn it into weaponry usage for killing...if this is exactly you mean, I fully agree that...
Naty1:
Thanks again for you already mentioned in the quotation that the matter universe we are having today was not "siginificant" at early time:
The amount of matter presently observable in the universe only requires an imbalance in the early universe on the order of one extra matter...
Naty1:
Thanks for the comment...but, of course I read what you spent 30 seconds before I wrote this post because VERY honestly to you wikipedia is my main source of information...however, I don't see any conflict between what I am trying to propose here and what wikipedia is telling there...
Zz :
Obviously you did not read my post carefully before you lost your temper and got excited...you admited that "The FACT right now is that we still do not have a clear idea on what causes the matter-antimatter imbalance. "...but you did not read carefully to find out that the whole point...
The world of anti-matter sounds like something only for fiction stories because scientific professionals seem to have not found enough reason to believe it yet. I in fact is not a professional in physics (I am a philosopher) but I like to read physics. I see the world of anti-matter to be quite...