I started from eq(3.113) and (3.114) of Peskin and merge them with upper relation for $S_F$, as following:
\begin{align}
S_F(x-y) &=
\theta(x^0-y^0)(i \partial_x +m) D(x-y) -\theta(y^0-x^0)(i \partial_x -m) D(y-x) \\
&= \theta(x^0-y^0)(i \partial_x +m) < 0| \phi(x) \phi(y)|0 >...
Summary:: Can anyone introduce an informative resource with solved examples for learning variation principle?
For example I cannot do the variation for the electromagnetic lagrangian when ##A_\mu J^\mu## added to the free lagrangian and also some other terms which are possible:
$$
L =...
Einstein's vacuum solution metric:
$$
ds^2 = -(1-\frac{2GM}{r})dt^2 +(1-\frac{2GM}{r})^{-1}dr^2+r^2 d\Omega^2
$$
which ##g_{\mu \nu}## can be read off easily.
metric Killing vectors are:
$$
K = \partial_t
$$$$
R = \partial_\phi
$$
How can I relate these to Maxwell equation?
$$\bar u(p') \gamma^i u(p) = u^\dagger(p') \gamma^0 \gamma^i u(p)$$
if ##p = p'## we can use
$$u^\dagger(p) u(p) = 2m \xi^\dagger \xi$$
but how can we conclude the statement?
dear @vanhees71
And 1 more question, do you have any idea to explicitly show that ##\sigma^2 \psi^*_L## transforms like a right-handed spinor? using the identity.
My attempt at solution:
in tetrad formalism:
$$ds^2=e^1e^1+e^2e^2+e^3e^3≡e^ae^a$$
so we can read vielbeins as following:
$$
\begin{align}
e^1 &=d \psi;\\
e^2 &= \sin \psi \, d\theta;\\
e^3 &= \sin \psi \,\sin \theta \, d\phi
\end{align}
$$
componets of spin connection could be written by using...