"The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≤0 half-plane." - this one is wrong. There were several options in this problem.
The right one: The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≥0 half-plane.
Thank you very much. I know this is easy but I was...
The trajectory of a particle is a semi-circle contained in the x≤0 half-plane.
Well, this is somewhat weird. I have come across examples with x(t)=cos(t), y(t)=sin(t) and not the other way round.
By the way, my answer is wrong but I don't know why. This is probably silly. :(
You may want to benefit from licentia poetica. :)
A long time ago I have written a post about Émilie du Châtelet: https://blogs.otago.ac.nz/emxphi/emilie-du-chatelet-and-experimental-philosophy-i/
Elinor is my avatar's name in Second Life.
Perhaps a gradient would be also a good idea:
Gradient ##\vec (0.21, 0.105171)##
A tangent plane: 0.21*x + 0.105171*y-0.32
Slope of the gradient: 0.500814
I got:
-10.3022 + 13.3022*x = y
x=1.1
Approximation of the change:
4.33022-3=1.33022
A beautiful metaphor: ##t\longmapsto f(t)## is the path, and you should plant the flowers at ##t=1## and ##t=1.1.##
Many thanks. But I can't read this:
"The linear approximation is the secant through these points:
You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math mode ?
A nice quote from Leibniz. :) Émilie du Châtelet (my avatar) was Leibnizian. :)
##f_x=3*x^2+y##
##f_y=2*y+x##
##(3*(t^2)^2+e^{t-1})*2*t+(2*e^{t-1}+t^2)*e^{t-1}##
Well, I am not sure how to evaluate it.
I got a wrong result by multiplying by 0.1, i.e.
##((3*(t^2)^2+e^{t-1})*2*t+(2*e^{t-1}+t^2)*e^{t-1})*0.1##
I guess it is trivial but I am lost. :(
Well, I have studied the definition of the orthogonal matrix:
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/OrthogonalMatrix.html
"The rows of an orthogonal matrix are an orthonormal basis. That is, each row has length one, and are mutually perpendicular."
There is a constraint: -1/sqrt(2) in the left top...