Why would velocity affect the time relationship between two things? That's kind of something I've always wondered about relativity. If something is going twice as fast then it goes twice as far in the same time. If time slowed down as you went faster then everything would appear to be moving the...
The universe is too big for us to determine, yet, if all the galaxies are revolving around a center. Logically, if there were a big bang, there would exist a perfect center where everything is moving away from. There is no reason to believe that the galaxies wouldn't simulate an orbital effect...
A point moving through any of the three dimensions experiences time because it is moving. Time does not exist without motion. If anything, time is a +1 dimension to any existing dimension. In other words, time is a property of a dimension to measure motion in that dimension (it takes time to get...
Not planning to go out on a limb like I did with my magnetism questions/theory.
Does light have mass?
Does light have inertia?
Does light have acceleration?
If light doesn't have mass, then is it even possible for it to have inertia and acceleration?
More questions to come after I get...
Many "why's" have been answered by mankind. We're just now starting to get into the why's at the source of the universe. The answers are there, they just need to be found.
Finally somebody actually answered my original question. Doesn't change my opinion, but at least it's a good try. The local acceleration of one dimensional space is more or less the type of answer I was looking for. A clarification of why there is expected to be a change in 'space' at all would...
Tesla tried to harness the energy of the Earth as an unlimited power source. He understood the laws of thermodynamics. Investors started to retract their interests because of bad media around Tesla. Good inventor, bad business man.
If time stops entirely at light speed then wouldn't light not be affect by time since it is moving light speed. That would mean light would have an infinite velocity.
The polar coordinates are length and width. Look at a flat map of the world. The depth is still there but not measured because we live on the surface of the Earth. If we ever start living at the bottom of the sea, then we will add a depth to the polar coordinates.
I'm beating a live horse. You have yet to dispute any of the deductions that lead to my conclusion. I checked into Maxwell's equations and see no reason that they wouldn't apply the same to my theory as they do to the accepted 'theory'. You shouldn't just tell me I'm wrong and assume I should...
The cold interstellar medium just happens to be a body of hydrogen like I predicted. A radio wave is not magnetism. A 21cm wavelength has a frequency below 100mHz (1429 is infrared or microwaves; where did you get that from?). Gonna have to do better than that.
Going by e=mc^2, an object can't exceed the speed of light. The truth still depends on whether Einsteins theories are correct. I could be incorrect, but I believe that we have yet to truly turn matter into energy or vice versa. A nuclear bomb (either fission or fusion) still doesn't destroy...