Thank you Polyrhythmic and George Jones for the reply and references,
I am looking for detailed calculations. I have some specific questions.
1. when we solve Klein-Gorden equation in Schwarzschild geometry, near scri+ and scri- we get both solutions outgoing and ingoing. how is it that...
Can anybody help me with the original calculations of hawking radiation. I am working out the details of Hawking's original paper on black hole radiation. I am getting stuck at many places. Does anyone know about some place where the detailed calculations can be found.
thanks a lot for the reply. but I have some doubts. how do you know that this will happen? is there any experimental evidence or any theoretical analysis? if whatever you are saying is correct, then it means we have to do the experiment in dark. in the presence of light, we won't get...
In double slit experiment of electron, we see an interference pattern when we don’t know through which slit electron has passed and we don’t see an interference pattern when we know through which slit electron has passed. Now, to identify the slit through which electron has passed, we use...
1. Suppose in Schrodinger cat thought experiment we place a camera inside the chamber which record the events happening inside the chamber. (We are not watching inside the chamber through the camera during the period of experiment. It is just for recording purpose). After one half life of...
transforming away uniform gravity field means you go to a frame in which there is no gravity i.e. you observe the first accelerating frame from an inertial frame. for transforming away gravity you don't have to stick to the accelerating frame.
But, for a uniform gravity field case there exist a tranformation in which Riemann tensor becomes zero everywhere and hence manifold is flat for a uniform gravity field. (In short curvature is zero for a uniform gravity field)
Is it possible to eliminate Gravity completely even locally as equivalence principal says? I think this is not possible,since in a curved spacetime, Riemann tensor cann't be made zero in any frame. Then in what sense equivalence principal(which says that for a freely falling observer in a...
Pseudo forses arising in a frame are defined as the negative of mass times acceleration of the frame used. now in cylindrical coordinate system if we compute acceleration, we should be able to know completely the corilis and centripetel forses.
However my problem is I don't understand...
was original EPR paper (as written by Einstein) contradicted uncertainty principal or was it against the copenhegon interpretation of QM? please tell me any website where original EPR paradox is discussed.