Recent content by Miguel Velasquez

  1. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    I agree with you, I am tired to check over and over my result, it doesn't seems to be nothing wrong with it, nothing wrong with math or reasoning, its a problem about definition. How do books define "Force exerted by a liquid in open liquid filled tank" is the question to answer. If we define...
  2. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    Thanks to both for your response, sorry for late reply, there was a blackout earlier. Ill try to read carefully both answers to see if i can clarify my doubt.
  3. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    I got that feeling too, i have been checking this result for weeks, with few sleep and can't find any mistake in my reasoning. Can anyone else confirm if this result is correct/wrong please?
  4. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    I must be doing something wrong because books point the F_liq=MassLiquid*g. See by example "Serway - Physics for Scientists, 7th Ed, page 409, exercise 11." "11. A swimming pool has dimensions 30.0 m 10.0 m and a flat bottom. When the pool is filled to a depth of 2.00 m with fresh water, what...
  5. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    Sorry maybe i have should pointing from the beginning my attempt to solve the problem was in the pdf file, i repost the link http://docdro.id/SYbWm95
  6. Miguel Velasquez

    Forces due to atmospheric pressure won't cancel in an open tank

    Homework Statement [/B] I am trying to understand why books always point as a fact that hydrostatic force on the bottom of a open liquid filled tank doesn't depend on the force due atmospheric pressure because they these forces cancels each other. Homework Equations [/B] P=[P][/o]+ρgh F=P*A...
  7. Miguel Velasquez

    Young's Modulus Formula / Steel Cable

    Wow! you were right, i plugged in a wrong value, thank you RUber! Could you tell me why the force must be averaged? What i did is use F=M_tot*g=(2.4Kg/m)(500m)(9.8m/s2), but this seems to be wrong.
  8. Miguel Velasquez

    Young's Modulus Formula / Steel Cable

    When i plug in the data into your eq. i get 0.016333333 m which is not the right answer. The link seems to works for me, can anyone else test the link i gave? Thank you Ruber for trying.
  9. Miguel Velasquez

    Young's Modulus Formula / Steel Cable

    A steel cable 3.00 cm 2 in cross-sectional area has a mass of 2.40 kg per meter of length. If 500 m of the cable is hung over a vertical cliff, how much does the cable stretch under its own weight? Take Y steel ϭ 2.00 ϫ 10 11 N/m 2 .Y=([L][/o]F)/(A*delta_L) My attempt of solution...
  10. Miguel Velasquez

    When you heat a sheet, does it expand or compress?

    Thanks for reply my question James, problem is solved. Taking again a look at the figure you can notice the value of d actually increases when the sheet is being heated which would reduce the value of theta.
  11. Miguel Velasquez

    When you heat a sheet, does it expand or compress?

    Oh now i can see where i am mistaken, the value of d is infact increasing when the sheet expand and not being reduced as i thought. This explains why the correct answer is letter a) it moves toward the centerline. When the value of d is increased, the argument of arcsin will be reduced. For some...
  12. Miguel Velasquez

    When you heat a sheet, does it expand or compress?

    i think theta is the angle shown in the figure source of figure: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/imgpho/doubsli.gif
  13. Miguel Velasquez

    When you heat a sheet, does it expand or compress?

    If a sheet containing two very thin slits is heated (without damaging it), what happens to the angular location of the first-order interference minimum? a) It moves toward the centerline. b) It moves away from the centerline. c) It doesn't change.Condition for m-order interference minimum...
Back
Top