It is possible that the selective hunting may indeed have decreased the stocks of the high-essential prey, and the downswings accompanied by "calory hunting" of other species may have forced our ancestors into cannibalistic brain eating. This would explain why big-brained human ancestors before...
I never claimed that it was about predators categorically never eating anything other than one body part. I was thinking of some hunters needing more of a nutrient hunting animals with a higher percentage of some nutrients but with lower overall energy. Especially in the case of animals that...
It is true that big animals contain more calories than small animals. However, are the figures for the content of essential nutrients that are not calories different? Such nutrients may be limiting factors and require foraging strategies that would be suboptimal from a simple calory point of...
I found the information at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turritopsis_dohrnii#Distribution_and_range
I want to know by how much they have spread, where.
What is the current habitat range of Turritopsis dohrnii or the "immortal" jellyfish? I know that there are multiple species of the Turritopsis genus and that the species dohrnii have recently increased its range by ballast water spread. What is the current range of the exact species dohrnii?
It is often said that gravity is a curvature of space-time and not a force. But since gravity is caused by mass, there must be some way in which mass curves space-time. What are the equations for how mass affect space-time?
Is it possible that the reason why gravity is the weakest fundamental force is because it is disappearing into the distant future? Similar to string theory's notion that gravity dissipates into other dimensions, only in this case it is time it dissipates through? Radon 220 and radium 224 nuclei...
The standard argument for the claim that time "must" be an illusion is the metalaw problem, that asymmetry such as fundamentally irreversible time in which the future literally does not exist would allow the laws of physics to change and we have not detected any change of the laws of physics...
In this case, it is a falsifiable hypothesis: that a force that works in the same direction as something caused by the Casimir effect contributes to the negative pressure caused by the Casimir effect, even if the added force in and by itself would not cause such a negative pressure. The...
I am asking whether or not such an experiment have been done. If I had a reference to such an experiment, I would be reading that and not ask for it on forums. As for your ideas on "having legs", are you ignorant of what Karl Popper said? The falsifiable predictions and testing is what matters...
When I wrote "not about measuring the Casimir effect per say", I was referring to the small Casimir effect produced directly by the proximity between the plates, as a reply to it being too small to measure in the presence of a magnetic field. There is no mutual exclusivity between that and...
It is not a simple thought experiment. It is a question of whether or not the experiment have been done IRL. Different models of quantum gravity makes different predictions of when quantum effects can be combined with and equivalent to classic effects. The only way to find out is to do...
Just because you may not be able to *measure* the Casimir effect in the magnetic field doesn't mean the Casimir effect doesn't exist there. It's like Neptune existed before telescopes were invented. Though in this case, it is still possible to know at what distance between the plates the Casimir...