Recent content by Kyueong-Hwang

  1. Kyueong-Hwang

    What are the lattice points for this?

    In picture, there is crystal structure with two atoms. Question is, what is the lattice points? Find a set of lattice points. I think green and pink points are both lattice points. Am i right? This is our full hw.
  2. Kyueong-Hwang

    QM Weinberg Probl 9.1: Solving for Eq of Motion with Defined Lagrangian

    ah your right. my fault. is there any way to make this eq more clear? next question is to make hamiltonian and find Schrodinger eq. It may should be more clear.
  3. Kyueong-Hwang

    QM Weinberg Probl 9.1: Solving for Eq of Motion with Defined Lagrangian

    alright thanks 1, at latex q&a page i miss d notation so i use partial 2. \dot \vec x isn't work so i think x_i does too
  4. Kyueong-Hwang

    QM Weinberg Probl 9.1: Solving for Eq of Motion with Defined Lagrangian

    if ##x_i## is a axis of 3-dim cartesian coordinate two ##f \left( \vec x \right)## terms yield ##\vec \nabla \times \vec f \left(\vec x \right)## But there is no such statement assure that ##x_i## is 3-dim cartesian coordinate. And someone in this forum site says in higher than 3 dimension curl...
  5. Kyueong-Hwang

    QM Weinberg Probl 9.1: Solving for Eq of Motion with Defined Lagrangian

    $$ \frac {\partial \mathfrak {L}} {\partial x_i} =\frac {\partial \vec x} {\partial t} \cdot \partial x_i \vec f \left(\vec x \right) - \partial x_i V \left(\vec x \right)$$ $$ \frac {\partial} {\partial t} \left(\frac {\partial \mathfrak {L}} {\frac {\partial x_i} {\partial t}} \right)= m \ddot...
  6. Kyueong-Hwang

    QM Weinberg Probl 9.1: Solving for Eq of Motion with Defined Lagrangian

    Homework Statement specific lagrangian is defined. Have to get a equation of motion Homework Equations [/B] Lagrangian is defined as The Attempt at a Solution [/B] eq of motion that i drive like i guess term of f(x) have to vanish or form a shape of curl. but it didn't be clear...
Back
Top