So justification for time dilation not changing exposure to inherited motion because you always pull inherited motion from frame which is at rest on A/B axis? This is like pretending there is no motion between the mother ships.
This seems odd if all other motion slows for shuttle such as clocks and life. Clocks and life too have same inherited motion contained within them so it must slow in some cases but not others?
It's not about what A frame sees for C, it call itself at rest. What does A see for D? It has motion.
Inherited motion I thought well known... You stand on train moving and play catch, you and ball has inherited velocity of train. In space with ships, shuttle inherit velocity component of its...
Okay but if shuttle experience less time how can it not experience less exposure to inherited velocity component from its mother? A will see D have a velocity component it inherits from B, and will also see it experiences less time, if it didn't D clock would not be less than B.
Yes, this is what I see in mind, but the issue to me is the shuttle is exposed to the horizontal velocity for less time. Do you see? How can cable remain perpendicular if red gets horizontal velocity for longer? Blue experience less time, not just less ticks on clock. So it gets horizontal...
So in scenario in which two ships(A and B) are moving relative to each other, and towards each other; each ship will measure the other to have a velocity. Within special relativity no observer himself moves. Do you agree?
If you agree, assume each of the above two ships sends out shuttle along...