Recent content by Jacob Peters

From the paper: “As shown before, the path presence it not a statistical aver- age but can be attributed to every single detected neutron. We can exclude the possibility that some neutrons have taken only one path and other neutrons have taken only the other path and that they are distributed...

Ok, but they specifically quote mr scientist saying: “ The results show that individual particles experience a specific fraction of the magnetic field applied in one of the paths, indicating that a fraction or even a multiple of the particle was present in the path before the interference of...

Then please explain where the scientifical article says part of each neutron took both paths: “As shown before, the path presence it not a statistical aver- age but can be attributed to every single detected neutron. We can exclude the possibility that some neutrons have taken only one path and...

seemed like it did. Did you miss this part?:

you’re going to tell me there’s no “rivalry” between Brohmian, CI, and superdeterminism...lol...

Thanks! 😊 I was wondering about Bohmian Mechanics specifically as well. I guess I thought proving superposition -> proving Schrödiger’s Cat -> Proving CI . a bit surprised but not knowing much also not surprised i got it wrong. what would it take to prove one interpretation over another...

Hi, From what I read here, they did a double slit experiment test with neutrons that seemed to confirm superposition that the particle was in both places at once. Thoughts?