REMINDER
A - Here is what Chalnoth said: "The only way to understand reality at a deep level is through mathematics."
B - This is my reply, without any comment from my part - a simple quote: "As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are...
I am not being emotional - you are. A simple Einstein quote triggered some kind of a hysterical (chain) reaction. Untill you come to grip with it, good luck, & stop driving personal attacks towards me. You don't know me, & I don't know you. Stop being superficial, & pretend analyzing me. You...
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein
Guys, your problem is obviously Einstein quotation, not me. Have a grip, I did not post any misinterpretation of Einstein quote. It seemed appropriate since it dealt with math & reality. You are the one interpreting.
I don't understand the quote fully, sure, I'm not a scientist of the caliber of Einstein to pretend the contrary...But it sounds awfully close to what Chalnoth was describing, math to explain reality, to which Einstein seem to oppose a different approach...Now go ahead and tell in what sense is...
mmm ...I wasn't lying, not even trying to put anything out of context (don't even know what is the right context, & I don't even understand Einstein quote fully, except that it deals with math application to reality, which was what you mentionned)- however a violent reaction of this sort, (that...
"As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality." - Albert Einstein
Time as our psychological interpretation of events, whether they occur sequentially or all at once. Could time be our mind's way to arrange things, regardless of how they exist or occur really?
If someone wanted to test the "theory of God", he/she might postulate that the creation model would have to look something like the Big Bang. THe Big Bang has a lot of that "will-instantly-creating" to it. It's just there. I am not saying that a god theory can be scientific or tested. But...
Parallel universes...Multiverses...Something created out of Nothing...etc...A case could be made that all these theories are weird, if not lunatic, & unprovable. Why then cosmologists readily accept to discuss them, but reject the concept of a "superior will" behind all existence - God - as if...