Point taken. I have played around with Bing a bit and it's language model and ability to process mass amounts of internet data in meaningful ways is compelling and powerful. It seems more like a more intelligent and user friendly search engine, than the disruptive faux human intelligence that...
But why are we spending so much effort to produce these models when we can just ask someone like Leonard Susskind what he thinks? It's like making an omelette and celebrating it as novel when a soufflé already exists.
I responded to an old post showcasing Tesla's AI breakthroughs, perhaps my reply has some relevance here in taking the AI hype down a notch: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/new-tesla-dojo-ai-architecture.1006902/post-6976784
It turns out tens of thousands of years of biological evolution churn out a pretty good bio computing machine for the 3d world we live in. Trying to recreate this level of aptitude in a silicon based transistor technology has proven extremely challenging. Also, we simply can't create a matrix...
I agree. My use case is on the high end of the AI performance scale. I acknowledge that there are lots of applications that will benefit from the fast evolving tech of AI. I guess my response is more of a reaction to much of the dramatic hype we see in media of having to "pull the plug" as AI...
Way over my head but gonna toss some laymen barstool talk in the mix. Feel free to ignore me if this is useless. This reminds me of something I find myself coming back to when contemplating esoteric mathematical ideas: Notions of a finite but unbounded universe. You can have a set of real...
I think what you're positing is that there is more to discover. I don't think any scientist would disagree. You also seem to be suggesting that sci-fi hypothesis that we are all in a simulation of sorts. These are interesting and compelling ideas to ruminate. The more time you can invest in...
Thanks for your great contributions! I found this stackexchange thread that had some interesting replies that relate and builds on the points you've made. It's a bit tangential at times to the actual fluid immersed anti-G discussion but I thought I'd share as you might find it interesting. The...
Here's the thing about all the AI hype imo. Put the server farm running it in a total sandbox. That is, no external access to anything, with a big red button kill switch just in case. OK, now ask it the biggest problems plaguing humankind. Poverty, climate change, the theory of everything...
This is essentially why I posed the hypothesis in the first place. If a more efficient anti-G system was developed this potentially wouldn't be a limit.
My post wasn't about how to improve the overall tactical ability of a fighter jet. Nobody said at any point g-suit or anti-G systems was high...
So your position is that current fighter pilots are not at all concerned with executing high-G maneuvers? I never contended modern fighter aircraft are not multirole and only pure fighters. It seems you're not refuting any of the core hypothesis of the advantages of a pilot being suspended...
While having the smartest weapons is a big factor in mission success. So is having a better machine. Faster and more maneuverable. Current fighter pilots spend a lot of time training these high-G maneuvers, it didn't stop in the 80s. However, this is still a good point, having the smartest...
I would add that additionally high-G maneuvers are required to evade missiles and other enemy fire. EDIT: and also for radar defeat like nape of earth tactics