I think the OP had read Isacc Asimov's Book : Flatland, and is looking for repetition in the general populace for those ideas as to whether he accepts these ideas as holding weight.
If he reads this: Flatland was a fictional book based off of 1940s ideas of physics. Now obviously we have...
If you think about it the big picture is what physicists are trying to get at. Here is an example: The human body is made up of many different organs. Now, to understand what these organs do and how they interact and support each other we have to study them individually. Once we do that and...
you can imaginatively give 'vacume' any properties you want, but you cannot change the tested facts.
kcodon is right, and you cannot look at it as an ocean. It is devoid of matter. Therefore, lacking in material things like mass, weight, pressure, energy, ETC.
Yes you are on the right track...
I have found a few sites that contains plans for a hydraulic engine that could run itself for a total of nine days.
http://www.rexresearch.com/clemengn/clemengn.htm"
http://www.keelynet.com/energy/clemindex.htm"
Would it be practical to use this as an engine.
i recently heard that ups is designing and testing a hydraulic system to power a torque converter for an efficient delivery system i need to know the validity of the situation and the plausibility of it being run by an electrically powered motor.
i am not sure if they are able to interact or not, but i believe that if they are able to interact it would make a profound advancement in the understanding of gravity.
actually if it was learning at a geometric rate the program would find ways to hide itself as software in the internet, not just as a metal skeleton, but also as a base program that could adapt itself to any electronic environment even power lines. Its environment would be specifecly broad. We...
i thought force carrying particles were messenger particles that are used in equations. I'm therefore not sure that there is proof of them existing as a state of masslike matter. Please clear this up for me.
This sounds like the properties of the wave of light: As the vibration increases energy is decreased, but as vibration decreases energy is increased. If you substitute acceleration for energy and vibration of wavelength for vibration of matter you get the same result. Correct?