Dear Sirs,
I'm Not A Specialist In Physics But Enjoy Very Much Reading And Studying About Maths And Physics.
Just A Few Questions.
Can It Be, That All Particles Are Born From Special Space - Time Geometry Conditions?
And That If All Space - Time Geometry Is Being Influenced By Particles And...
I Read That Einstein Began Searching For An Explanation Of Gravity In The Em Waves...
I'm Not Aware That This Has Been Proven To Be Wrong.
I Only See That Em Has Been Related To The Weak Force..
Can Gravity Be Only After Em Waves Exist Or Does Gravity Exist At And Within The Weak And Strong...
you say that to be able to go back in time all changes must be reversed...if this could be done or if this actually happens naturally then, or rather, therefor they are also changes ...these new ''reversed'' changes are also processes with a rate of change one respect to another...so I'm sure...
q on lorentz
what I'm envisaging is k2 not running parallel to k and with no apparent v.
lets place k2 on the other side of k1.
in a diferent frame altogether. that is, k on one side of k1 and k2 on the other side.
if the k2 frame is on its own axis at x=0 y=0 and z=o when we begin with the...
yes we are referring to this thought experiment. thank you. and i apologise.
we are also talking about 2 uniformly moving frames. ie K AND K1.
IT TOOK ME SOME TIME TO FIGURE WHAT THIS WAS ALL ABOUT.
the observer K is never stationary.
if this were not so, that is if K DID NOT MOVE AT V...
I Recently Went Through The Derivation Of The Lorentz Transformations Again...
I'm Reading A Book By Einstein On Sr And Gr.
It Came To Me That Instead Of Using Only K And K1 Frames When Explaining The Vertical Mental Experiment Of K1 With A Mirror Placed Vertically Above It At A Distance L And...
zero is served to us by one ''finite description''
zero is served to us by one ''finite description'' within which we find that it excludes the posibilty of ''something'' existing.
these descriptions are absurd.
this is because we are always dealing with ''uniques''.
lets see one example...
and because the point is ''two diferent perceptions of same object or event BY SAME PERSON'' i have to add that one is not always sending the same envelopes to himself.
He will not open the first one before he has sent a second one on the same TOPIC.
he is always trying to add more and more...
The envelopes and the red ball.
Receiving and Retaining ‘’what’’ information.
Not ‘’all the posible states of this red ball’’ are manifested to us.
And Not all manifestations are received.
And Not all is permanently retained.
We process and add to complete.
Ones relationship with this...
suggestions were put forward by me, that for the merging of trillions of minimum volumetrics within a vast volume of these same minimum volumetrics, other neighbouring ones, would be in an elastic non merging phase.
stretched volumetrics cannot then be involved in the creation of certain...
One is one only for one one.
I’m sitting on circular aproximation equations.
With nexo properties that have nothing to do with sets of numbers.
One is one only for one one.
That is, the next other one is one only for this new other one and one alone.
And it is not itself that other...
we have the time t that it takes to observe 'A'.
'A' then must be considered as an event.
or a process.
any asymmetric unique minimum volumetric with respect to itself has no such t because there is no event or process for it to be related to or relative to.
t here is not an issue.
infact...
any diminute portion of our cosmological total volumetric can be ''involved or not'' in a process or in an event that will have a beginning and an end and is therefor only a fraction of our total cosmological volumetric.
ageing is a relative to situation also.
however i believe that diminute...