To Chronos: The statement (approximately) cited initially, was made at most 3 years ago.
I expected, that by the wording it would be understood as recent.
To Chronos: Aristoteles' laws of movement also go a long way back.
To Salvestrom: A great chunk of thanks !
[Although it seems (almost) crüel to spoil their apetites ! ]
To Chalnot: As I observed in my response to George Jones, I am not interested in the
cosmological constant. As stated initially in this thread, I am interested
in viscosity. I didn't anticipate,that my interest would be regarded as so
opaque to...
ThankYou Chalnot and George Jones for responding.
To Chalnot: My quotes are not aimed at You. Please disregard them, if they pain You.
As for old theories sticking up their heads, this is common, even if they
still don't qualify. As for what I'm trying to say...
ThankYou Chalnoth and Chronos for responding.
The "model" has indeed been in the "dustbin", but it appears, that like some other kinds of "dust" it has a tendency to creep out of the "dustbin" ! This may indeed try one's patience.
However, the who said "it" seemed to have reached a finite...
Who said approximately:
The viscosity of
the aether / vacuum state / zero-point-field / or whatever
is ridiculous / ridiculously large / great / high ?
This person had computed it using i.a. the c0 value of light speed.
What else was in the formula ?
/ Grateful for info...