Recent content by anbhadane

  1. A

    A Why do we extremize the Lagrangian in the Hamilton principle instead of energy?

    Anyway I am now clear with my doubt. 2T - H is another form of L so basically it's the same as L. I was interested in only T + V. Thank you for your valuable responses.
  2. A

    A Why do we extremize the Lagrangian in the Hamilton principle instead of energy?

    I know in action we use lagrangian which is T - V, but i am saying instead of T-V, can we use T+V? anyway it's function too.
  3. A

    A Why do we extremize the Lagrangian in the Hamilton principle instead of energy?

    sorry, I was saying action with energy as function.
  4. A

    A Why do we extremize the Lagrangian in the Hamilton principle instead of energy?

    so, basically we find first path and it automatically satisfies the minimum energy requirement?
  5. A

    A Why do we extremize the Lagrangian in the Hamilton principle instead of energy?

    I know that by extremizing lagrangian we get equations of motions. But what if we extremize the energy? I am just little bit of confused, any help is appreciated.
  6. A

    I What is semipositive definite?

    Oh, Thank you, got it.
  7. A

    I What is semipositive definite?

    In Jackson,(3rd edition) Chapter 1 , page no, 44 He uses the word "semipositive definite" what is it? is it "non-negative" definite?
  8. A

    A Solving Jackson's 3rd Ed. Equations Involving A, L and g

    Oh, similar way of expansion, calculations on 547, are done. In Jackson's (p.547) equation such as (11.94) , (11.96), (11.98) are expanded by Taylor expansion.
  9. A

    A Solving Jackson's 3rd Ed. Equations Involving A, L and g

    Now I got it. I was thinking in very different way. First one was easy, and second one is essentially taylor expansion. But here we are just taking approximation, thank you all of you.
  10. A

    A Solving Jackson's 3rd Ed. Equations Involving A, L and g

    yes doubts are questions. Oh, I come to know about the first part but still for second question how is it possible to have metric tensor equal to exponential of metric tensor?
  11. A

    A Solving Jackson's 3rd Ed. Equations Involving A, L and g

    In Jackson, (3rd edition p. 545), there are equations they are given as, $$A = e^L $$ $$det A = det(e^L) = e^{Tr L}$$ $$g\widetilde{A}g = A^{-1} $$ $$ A = e^L , g\widetilde{A}g = e^{{g\widetilde{L}g}} , A^{-1} = e^{-L}$$ $$ g\widetilde{L}g = -L $$ I have several doubts. 1) $$det(e^L) =...
  12. A

    Physics Undergrad Seeking Clarification: Join the Discussion on PhysicsOverflow!

    Myself doing physics undergraduate in college. I have many doubts some concepts and want to clear them. Hope this community is as good as stackexhange.
Back
Top